From: Greg K. <gr...@ma...> - 2004-08-11 05:04:28
|
Another Gramps facility that could be very useful in principle, but needs some improvement in practice, is current addresses. Here are some of the issues: 1) Addresses are handled separately from event locations, which is unfortunate. Typically an entire family has the same current address, but the address editor doesn't recognize that. If you gave the same address to many relatives and the family moved, you'd have to change the records separately. 2) The input form lists Country before Postal Code. But paper mail addresses put the postal code first, because the format depends on the country. I probably switched them by mistake for several addresses that I put into Gramps. 3) I would really like to view, print, and/or export a list of living relatives with addresses. It would make a convenient addition to my address book, and I could also use it to see which relatives have missing or bad addresses in my Gramps file. It looks like even the "complete individual information" report omits addresses. Actually for an address book, the best would be to collate by address. 4) There is no documented place to put an e-mail address. The natural place is under "Internet", where an e-mail address can be entered as a "mailto:". But this is far from obvious. As with paper mail addresses, there is no simple way to collate these. -- /\ Greg Kuperberg (UC Davis) / \ \ / Visit the Math ArXiv Front at http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/ \/ * All the math that's fit to e-print * |