From: Don A. <dal...@us...> - 2002-06-22 20:14:52
|
I like both of these concepts. The first one, in particular, maps to the original concept of GRAMPS being an analysis system, not just a database. I like the idea of being able to link two or more people together as potentially the same person, and treat them as a single person without doing a full merge. I also like the idea of being able to break the person back into the original parts if you discover that you made a mistake. I would need to think on how to make this fit nicely into the current database. Right now we have a Person object and a Family object. Somehow a Person object would need to be able to consist of multiple Person objects. I'm not clear on the second one. Are we really talking about "Events" and not "Sources"? A christening is an event, and I can see multiple people linked to the same event. Is this what is meant? Don On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 04:47, Bj=F8rn-Helge Mevik wrote: > Hi! >=20 > I posed a question about the following on the `open discussion' forum > on sourceforge, and was encouraged to present them here. >=20 > 1) Does or will gramps support an `evidence/conclusion'-model for > genealogical research? By an evidence/conclusion-model I mean the > ability to clearly distinguish between the _facts_ (from sources) I > enter (i.e., the evidence) and the _conclusion_ I draw from the > facts. >=20 > For instance, in one church book record it says that a person > _Anders Foer_, son of Hans Andersen and Malena Christensdatter, was > christened November 22 1778. In another record, it says that a man > _Anders Hansen Nerfore_ married a woman Martha Hansdatter on > September 25 1804. These are pieces of _evidence_. Are `Anders > Foer' and `Anders Hansen Nerfore' the same person? Based on other > information in these (and other) sources, I believe they are. This > is my _conclusion_. >=20 > After having drawn the conclusion that two or more persons > referenced in sources, are the same, I want to treat them as one > person for `all practical purposes' when using the data base. >=20 > But if I simply store the informations as events (christening and > marriage) on a person (with alternative names), I lose the > information that this is based on a conclusion. If I later on find > contradicting evidence, I have no way to backtrace my reasoning and > correct the error. Similarly, it makes it very hard for other > people to trust my data, because they can't see what is evidence > and what is my conlusions. >=20 > 2) Does or will gramps support a `source oriented' way of entering > data? This can be somewhat related to the above, but it doesn't > have to. By source oriented, I simply mean that when I enter the > information from a source excerpt, I don't want to have to manually > spread that information to a lot of persons. >=20 > For instance, in the christening record above, it also says that > Mons Jelstad, Bi=F8rn Walnum Wigdell, Hans Christophersen F=F8lvigen > and Sara Iversdatter Foer were godfathers and godmothers for > Anders. So the record contains information about the name and > residence of seven people. It's tiresome, at best, to have to > manuall update (and often create) all those person records. >=20 > Even further, I would like to be able to extract or collect the > information from a source excerpt later on. (This becomes very > useful and important with an evidence/conclusion-model.) >=20 > I am searching for a genealogy program that have these features (or at > least plans to have them), and I would be willing to put some work in > it. I realise that it might not be easy to implement these features, > but I think they would bring the development of genealogical software a > great step forward. I'm very interested in finding and developing new > ways that a computer can _help_ me in my research. Today, most > genealogical software is not much more than a specialised data base > application. >=20 --=20 Don Allingham dal...@us... http://gramps.sourceforge.net |