From: Ron J. <ron...@co...> - 2014-07-01 22:20:36
|
How would 3 different pedigree charts not help you? On 07/01/2014 03:35 PM, TJMcK wrote: > I have never seen such a report, and maybe no one else has seen such a > report, but this is what I want. > > I would like to use a filter to select certain people (manually selecting > them is too much work). > Then I would have the option to go up the tree either by selecting fathers > or mothers of the filtered individuals. (Selecting both results in too many > people for this report.) > Then, once the end of the line people, for either father's or mother's side, > are found, the report would print a tree (or report) of all descendants of > that person (I think it would be useful to have an option to choose how many > generations the end of line person must have -- this would eliminate > printing information for groups that are not as significant). > > Here's what I believe a report like this would be useful for: > In my large dbase I have several families (call them "jones" or "Smith") > that could be a main "genetic line". I have not identified these lines yet, > but with this report it would find the significant groups of Smiths, and > with a hard copy like this I could compare the "trees" visually to see if > there are similarities (for instance in birth places). > > Does this make sense? It may be possible to create a filter within gramps > for finding all end-of-the line people, but my filtering knowledge is too > limited. If this is the case then I could print out each decendancy report > individually. (This may be the best option until a report like this is > created.) > > Can someone help? > > EXAMPLE: > ------------------------- > my gramps filter found person X1, Y1 and Z1 > I've selected to follow the father's line, so I have this > X5 > \ Y4 > X4 \ > \ Y3 > X3 \ > \ Y2 Z2 > X2 \ \ > \ Y1 Z1 > X1 > I have stated (in the report options) that there must be at least 4 > generations, so the Z line is discarded an only the descendants of X5 and Y4 > are printed. -- My word, man! Don't you know your quantum statistics? |