From: Tony P. <to...@pr...> - 2013-10-08 09:03:40
|
I'm not sure how flexible and accommodating Gramps is in respect of place-names. However, the approach that most people adopt is generally unworkable in the long term. There's a write-up of this issue that you might find interesting at: http://parallax-viewpoint.blogspot.com/2013/08/a-place-for-everything.html. Tony Proctor ----- Original Message ----- From: "paul womack" <pw...@pa...> To: <gra...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 8:42 AM Subject: Re: [Gramps-users] How to handle places changing names > Pat Clark wrote: >> I would keep the original name and then add an event note to the birth, >> listing the new(er) names and dates of change. >> >> And using the using the places editor add a note about the name changes. >> >> This is just my way, others will have a different method. Gramps lets us >> do things like this however we want. > > I often notice people claiming claiming Gramps lets you store > information however you choose. > > This is true, but only for *storing* data, > > In practice, if you wish your data to "play nice" > with the built in Gramps navigation, searching, and reporting > tools, your choices must be reasonably constrained > by context. > > To be clear, I think this is perfectly reasonable, > and is one of the reasons I keep asking for a guide > to "normal practise". > > BugBear > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most > from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-users mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users |