From: John R. <jr...@ce...> - 2013-09-29 14:29:30
|
On Sep 29, 2013, at 6:58 AM, Nick Hall <nic...@ho...> wrote: > On 29/09/13 01:16, John Ralls wrote: > >> Benny proposed working out the popularity of the add ons and creating a prioritized list of additional dependencies. I think that's an excellent idea. > > So do I. It would be interesting to know how popular each add-on is anyway. I get a lot of feedback on a couple of my add-ons, but hardly anything on the others. Is this because people don't have any problems with them? I perhaps nobody uses them? :) So I went to look. 3.4 and later pull from the repo instead of from "files", so there aren't any stats. We could look at the stats for 3.3, but I think that that isn't going to paint a very accurate picture. Regards, John Ralls |