From: Tim L. <guy...@gm...> - 2013-07-02 14:07:22
|
Indeed, there is no good tag. Moreover, as described here [1] the call name should be a name that already appears elsewhere in the name, therefore it may be thought to be unnecessary to output it in GEDCOM. If you still particularly think that export of Call Name should be added, you could submit a Feature Request [2], but I cannot hold out great hope that it would be actioned!! Regards, Tim. [1] http://www.gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=CallName#Call_Name [2] http://www.gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=Using_the_bug_tracker -- View this message in context: http://gramps.1791082.n4.nabble.com/Where-is-Call-in-Gedcomfilen-tp4661224p4661294.html Sent from the GRAMPS - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |