From: Benny M. <ben...@gm...> - 2013-03-01 09:03:07
|
2013/3/1 jerome <rom...@ya...> > Is it OK for a '4.0.0 beta1' released wednesday morning (Europe)? > > tuesday's night in America, end of wednesday in Oceania? > As commented before, make it a last alpha, as there were really many changes, and we don't want to give wrong impression to user. Benny > > --- En date de : Jeu 28.2.13, Benny Malengier <ben...@gm...> > a écrit : > > De: Benny Malengier <ben...@gm...> > Objet: Re: [Gramps-devel] Gramps 4.0.0 beta1? > À: "jerome" <rom...@ya...> > Cc: "John Ralls" <jr...@ce...>, "Gramps Development List" < > gra...@li...>, "Tim Lyons" <guy...@gm...> > Date: Jeudi 28 février 2013, 21h26 > > > > > 2013/2/28 jerome <rom...@ya...> > > Should we wait some days for 'beta1'? (DB locks improvements, new > gramplocale implementation, python2/3 (tools), mediaref, drag&drop > features, etc ...) > > Yes. I did svn up, and was really amazed at the amount of changed files :-) > > Best after weekend, so that some more issues are catched. But do give a > target date, then everybody can work towards that, eg next tuesday? > > Benny > > > > > > --- En date de : Mar 26.2.13, Benny Malengier <ben...@gm...> > a écrit : > > > > De: Benny Malengier <ben...@gm...> > > Objet: Re: [Gramps-devel] Gramps 4.0.0 beta1? > > À: "John Ralls" <jr...@ce...> > > Cc: "Gramps Development List" <gra...@li...>, "Tim > Lyons" <guy...@gm...> > > > Date: Mardi 26 février 2013, 1h11 > > > > > > > > > > 2013/2/25 John Ralls <jr...@ce...> > > > > > > > > On Feb 25, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Tim Lyons <guy...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Benny Malengier wrote > > > > >> Gramps > > > > >> 40 needs to be database interchangeable with 3.4, to allow people to go > > > > >> back, even if they did not have a backup. Gramps 4.0 is a big change. > > > > > > > > > > I think it is very unlikely that the version of bsddb that gets installed > > > > > when people upgrade to the new GTK will be the same as their current > bsdbd. > > > > > So going back to Gramps3.4 is not likely to work. > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are two flavors of DB version in play: The schema version (16 for > Gramps34 and Gramps40, 17 for Gramps41) and the bsddb version. While > different versions of bsddb won't be able to read the same binary database, > it's still possible for two versions of Gramps to exchange XML files as > long as the schema version is the same. Gramps can't import an XML file if > the schema version is newer than the one it supports. > > > > > > > Indeed, this is the main problem. > > Concerning bsddb, once downloaded, installing equal bsddb for python 2 and > 3 is actually not difficult. It's only the default python2 version that > somehow runs behind somewhat. Not for the normal user, but somebody > creating a python2-bsddb3 package is possible. Also windows could create > package with equal bsddb as they have the entire toolchain under control. > > > > > > > Benny > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > John Ralls > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > > > > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > > > > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Gramps-devel mailing list > > > > Gra...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > > > > > > > > > > -----La pièce jointe associée suit----- > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb > > -----La pièce jointe associée suit----- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gramps-devel mailing list > > Gra...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > > > > > > > |