From: Jesse M. <da...@gm...> - 2013-02-13 18:35:51
|
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Ron Johnson <ron...@co...> wrote: > On 02/13/2013 09:27 AM, Jesse Meyer wrote: > > For example, say "South Carolina" is a part of the United States from > 1777 > > to 1861, then > > it would be a part of the Confederate States of America from 1861 to > 1865, > > then it would > > return to being part of the United States from 1865 to the present day. > > Then if I added Charleston as a location that's part of South Carolina, > the > > rest of the > > information would be filled in automatically. So if John Smith was born > in > > Charleston in 1 > > 835, and had a daughter in the same city in 1863, the country would > change > > automatically > > when the location of "Charleston" was selected for both births. > > Thoughts? > > The rule base for such a scheme would be... large. And complicated. > The user could add the hierarchy and dates as needed. I doubt the majority of gramp users would care to go into so much detail, but some researchers might. |