Re: [Gramps-devel] bad OSX build 3.2.6

[Richard T. <rjt...@th...>]

On 03/05/2011 21:08, John Ralls wrote:
> 
> On May 3, 2011, at 11:50 AM, John Ralls wrote:
> 
>>
>> On May 3, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Richard Taylor wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/05/2011 18:52, John Ralls wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On May 3, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Richard Taylor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have another problem now:
>>>>>
>>>>> 2643: ERROR: grampsgui.py: line 357: Gramps failed to start.
>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>> File
>>>>> "/Applications/Editors/Gramps.app/Contents/Resources/share/gramps/gui/grampsgui.py",
>>>>> line 337, in __startgramps
>>>>>  Gramps(argparser)
>>>>> File
>>>>> "/Applications/Editors/Gramps.app/Contents/Resources/share/gramps/gui/grampsgui.py",
>>>>> line 256, in __init__
>>>>>  register_stock_icons()
>>>>> File
>>>>> "/Applications/Editors/Gramps.app/Contents/Resources/share/gramps/gui/grampsgui.py",
>>>>> line 161, in register_stock_icons
>>>>>  base_reg_stock_icons(iconpaths, extraiconsize, items+items_legacy)
>>>>> File
>>>>> "/Applications/Editors/Gramps.app/Contents/Resources/share/gramps/gui/pluginmanager.py",
>>>>> line 90, in base_reg_stock_icons
>>>>>  pixbuf = gtk.gdk.pixbuf_new_from_file (icon_file)
>>>>> GError: Couldn't recognize the image file format for file
>>>>> '/Applications/Editors/Gramps.app/Contents/Resources/share/gramps/images/gramps.png'
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Any idea?
>>>>
>>>> That's really strange. Does the image look OK in Finder?
>>>>
>>>> What OS version are you running?
>>>>
>>>
>>> John,
>>>
>>> I am on 10.6.7.
>>>
>>> Comparing the package with 3.2.5 I notice that
>>> Contents/Resources/etc/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders is empty in 3.2.6 but
>>> it has lots of entries in 3.2.5. Also
>>> 'Contents/Resources/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders' has only 'svg_loader.so'
>>> in it, whereas 3.2.5 has many files.
>>>
>>> So it looks like something to do with the gtk build.
>>
>> Nope, not the build, the bundle. Sigh, I thought I'd gotten that.
>>
>> For Gtk+-2.24, they moved gdk-pixbuf into a separate project, and it now has its own module library, which didn't get bundled.
>>
>> What's odd is that gtk was able to find the modules in the build directory, so it must be hard-coding a path somewhere.
>>
>> I'll have a new bundle up shortly.
> 
> Seems I also had another variable name wrong in rungramps.py. I tested this time on a separate machine (like I should have done yesterday), and it loads OK for me now. 
> 
> Uploaded to SF as Gramps-Intel-3.2.6.1.dmg
> 

John

I still get the same error :-(

The gdk-pixbuf.loaders file now contains entries with path of the form:

"@executable_path/../Resources/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-ani.so"

Should @executable_path have been replaced with something?

There are now the loaders as expected but gdk is obviously not finding them.

ls ../Resources/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/
libpixbufloader-ani.so	libpixbufloader-ico.so	libpixbufloader-pnm.so
libpixbufloader-tiff.so
libpixbufloader-bmp.so	libpixbufloader-jpeg.so	libpixbufloader-qtif.so
libpixbufloader-wbmp.so
libpixbufloader-gif.so	libpixbufloader-pcx.so	libpixbufloader-ras.so
libpixbufloader-xbm.so
libpixbufloader-icns.so	libpixbufloader-png.so	libpixbufloader-tga.so
libpixbufloader-xpm.so



Richard