Re: [Gramps-users] Property transfer

[Gerald B. <ger...@gm...>]

Just calls for a little creativity. Shouldn't be much of a problem. If
all else fails, quote the gramps ids. "Sale of house fron I123 to
I456". Not so nice to read but clears up any ambiguities.

On 6/28/10, Stephen George <ste...@op...> wrote:
> On 29/06/2010 9:56 AM, Gerald Britton wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Petr Hejl<he...@se...>  wrote:
>>
>>> That would be certainly possible. However there is still the problem with
>>> limited information value. From list list of events of particular person
>>> (which includes this event) you can't tell whether the person is getting
>>> the
>>> house (son) or passing the house (father).
>>>
>> Of course you can.  Make the description:
>>
>> "Sale of house from father to son"
>>
>> Clear and unambiguous
>>
>
> And when you look at the event in Joe Blow's  list of events, you don't
> know which role Joe Blow played (Father or son), unless your already
> familiar with the family and the events in the family.
>
> Try "Sale of house from Father (Joe Blow) to Son (Andy Blow)"
> or  "Transfer of house from Father (Joe Blow) to Son (Andy Blow)"
>
> So when you look at the event in the son's list, you can work out which
> role the son played in the event.
>
> Tough luck if the son has same Christian name as father.
>
> Steve
>
>
>>
>>> P.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/28/2010 10:41 PM, Gerald Britton wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why not make the description:
>>>>
>>>> Sale of house to son from father
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> or something like that?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Petr Hejl<he...@se...>    wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>> I would like to ask about proper record of property transfer (from
>>>>> father to son). I think I should use event type "Property" using given
>>>>> date and place. So far so good. The event should be used (shared) for
>>>>> both father and son (at least I guess it is correct usage). I can't use
>>>>> the relationship specific description like "house received from father"
>>>>> (considering son). So in reports and in the ui it is not very
>>>>> informative. Perhaps I could use "house received from XY" which is
>>>>> neutral, but is even less informative. I could use two different
>>>>> events,
>>>>> but it doesn't seem right. What is the way you use? Any other
>>>>> suggestions?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> P.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
>>>>> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
>>>>> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gramps-users mailing list
>>>>> Gra...@li...
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-users mailing list
> Gra...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

Gerald Britton