From: Tim L. <guy...@gm...> - 2010-06-06 14:39:06
|
I'm not sure exactly in which manner you wish Gramps to behave differently for 'data' as opposed to 'metadata'. Hence, the following suggestion may or may not do what you want. The census gramplet currently uses an 'order' attribute to record the order in which the entries appeared in the census. This is totally irrelevant in the Narrative Web report (as it is now) and hence I would like it to be omitted from that report. (It is currently marked as private so that it will not appear if private data is omitted, but this is just a work-around). I suggest that if an attribute starts with an underscore, it be omitted from the output of reports. Similarly, if the note type starts with an underscore, then it too could be omitted from reports (you can type in new values for note types). There is a slight problem in that GEDCOM also uses underscore to denote things that are specific to a particular implementation, so this may be an undesirable overloading. -- View this message in context: http://gramps.1791082.n4.nabble.com/Notes-and-data-tp2244413p2245025.html Sent from the GRAMPS - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |