Re: [Gramps-devel] ADMIN: Upgrading Mantis...

[Doug B. <dou...@gm...>]

Nick,

I think I see one bug in the new Mantis: if one posts an issue with an
attachment, but then later changes the Project, then the attachment is
lost.

For an example, see: http://www.gramps-project.org/bugs/view.php?id=3904

I'm guessing that this is caused by the attachment now in the file
system, and Mantis stores the attachment based on the project name.
But I'm just guessing.

-Doug

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Nick Wallingford
<ni...@be...> wrote:
> I've done some testing and config, preparatory to moving the files in
> the database into the webhosting filesystem, taking the opportunity to
> upgrade our version of Mantis at the same time.
>
> I would appreciate it if a few of you would have a quick look at it to
> see if I've missed anything.
>
> Though this system *looks* like our regular bug tracker, be aware that
> the database is from last night's backup - and though you are welcome to
> test it about as much as you like ***do not*** use it in place of the
> existing bugtracker.  When I do the final conversion, this data will be
> thrown out, and we'll be using the 'normal'
> http://bugs.gramps-project.org data.
>
> The sandbox/new/playtime system for you to test is at
> http://www.gramps-project.org/mantis
>
> There doesn't appear to be much changed in the new version of Mantis;
> I'm mainly just wanting people who use the bug tracker more than I do to
> make sure it is functioning in general, and that the changes I've made
> to attachments have not broken anything.
>
> Your logins are the same as they would be for the 'real' bugtracker.
>
> If all looks fine, I'll hope to do the changeover tomorrow some time.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Nick
> ni...@gr...
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-devel mailing list
> Gra...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel
>