From: Benny M. <ben...@gm...> - 2010-03-23 10:04:08
|
Serge, Did you try this? Does it fix the issue, or are there sideeffects which are unwanted in the report? Benny 2010/3/22 Doug Morrison-Cleary <li...@ds...> > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:35:44 +0100 > Serge Noiraud <Ser...@fr...> wrote: > > > Duncan Lithgow a écrit : > > > On 19 March 2010 23:12, Serge Noiraud <Ser...@fr...> wrote: > > > ... > > >> Everybody who wants to have this bug solved quicker must vote for > > >> this bug. So We must register to the openoffice site then vote. > > >> If you know openoffice people in your country, ask them to vote > > >> for our bug. Their vote has a higher weight as ours. > > >> > > >> The pointers : > > >> The bug : http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101657 > > > > > Unfortunately, it looks like it is our problem and not theirs! As > someone explained on the bugtracker (well, commented), it looks like we > place the box in the background. To edit something in the background, a > ctrl-click is needed in the 3.x series of OOo. (In the 2.x series, I > think all you had to do was double-click if there was nothing in front. > > Here is the 'offending' line in the style definitions in the > content.xml file: > > style:run-through="background" > > Do we need the boxes in the background? Or can we just delete all these > lines (they appear in most of the graphic styles)? > > Doug > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-devel mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > |