From: Douglas S. B. <db...@cs...> - 2008-12-15 13:08:52
|
>> If we do want this functionality, then other tables will be able to have >> some of the same functionality as the People view. (Some thought may >> want >> to be made as to store this functionality in the view rather than the >> DbManager, but it isn't clear to me how we could do that). >> > > I am lost in this remark and have no time to check the code about what you > mean. If DbManager stores things about the people view, that would be most > strange. I would expect it to manage the family trees and at most be able > to > know what the default person of a family tree is.... > > Benny Oops, I meant DbState. Because the active person is handled in the DbState, one can't have multiple People Views that are independent of one another. Of course, if they are independent of one another, then they don't behave the same way. I'm just thinking out loud, wondering if we should rearrange the organization a little. -Doug |