From: Benny M. <ben...@gm...> - 2008-11-26 08:50:17
|
2008/11/26 Brian Matherly <br...@gr...> > Benny, > > > Brian, all, > > > > I'd like to let Serge go ahead and add GeoView to > > GRAMPS as experimental > > code in trunk. > > > > Does anyone disagree, details on: > > http://www.gramps-project.org/bugs/view.php?id=1551 > > > > The view would be experimental, meaning: > > > > 1/it would not be activated by default > > 2/it would not be added to the Makefiles for distribution > > yet, so not in > > 3.1.x until deemed sufficiently stable. > > 3/the dependencies would be checked, if not present, the > > view just does not > > show. > > > > The view is interesting, but it needs more eyeballs. > > Integrating it in trunk > > as was done previously for the MapView which never made the > > trunk, should > > increase the eyeballs. > > Obviously it also means other developers need to change the > > code on API > > changes and might jump in to change things. > > > > I further believe GeoView should not create new hard > > dependencies for > > GRAMPS. In this case, gtkWebkit is needed, if not present, > > no GeoView. > > I have not personally used the GeoView. So I don't personally know what > value it brings. Adding yet another dependency to Gramps makes me sad, but > if you think it is worth it, let's get it under source control > experimentally so we can manage changes better. True, looking at the evolution of applications though, I see webkit in amarok, within the plasma shell of KDE, in Tellico, ... It clearly is an evolution, and probably the same on GNOME, so the chances of a html layer being present on future desktops in gtk be it webkit or mozilla, are large. Benny > > > ~Brian > |