From: Jason S. <jsi...@gm...> - 2008-02-07 17:48:33
|
> I hope we're not talking about the change I recently made. I didn't > alter the images. (Though that could be done.) > The HTML forces the browser to dynamically resize the image to a > maximum of 800x600, but inserts a <a href="..."> so the user can get > to the larger original. Staphane, this change (a smart one) would not affect the final file size of the web output. If anything it would INCREASE the file size if those images were being scaled previously. I was thinking that the compression rates had been changed. On the other hand, the difference I saw in file size could very well have to do with a change in my image references that excluded a range of images on the new output. Point being that my experience isn't necessarily without error. My main focus is really about the size of my HTML files remaining within an acceptable range. -Jason |