Re: [Gramps-devel] [Gramps-bugs] Help, are they linked and how to file - "bug reports"

[Ken <ma...@sl...>]

Raphael,

    Thank you for your help.
    The last two seem to be fixed now, in revision 9807. Possible the 
changes that Gary made, reversing the changes in revision 9772. Those 
bugs seem to have happened since then.
    Will file the other one as it still happens.

Ken

Raphael Ackermann wrote:
> Ken,
>
> I'll try to answer your questions.
>
> On Jan 13, 2008 8:20 PM, Ken <ma...@sl...> wrote:
>   
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> I am getting the following using Gramps 3. I would like to file them on
>> the bug tracker, but the last two are related. Should they be filed as
>> one or two reports?
>>     
>
> File the first bug as one bug report, and the last two as another one.
> Just add info to when thes bugs happen at one bug report for the
>
> " close
>     if self.opened:
> AttributeError: PersonCompare instance has no attribute 'opened'
> "
>
> bug.
>
>   
>> Also there are many 'bug report' windows that have
>> "AttributeError: ???????? instance has no attribute 'opened'"
>> at the end, and are produced by windows in different views. Should the
>> "AttributeError:" bugs be linked to the same report (produced doing the
>> same thing with the windows)? and if so, under which heading on 'bug
>> tracker'? under each view or on the interface ?
>>     
>
> Have it on the interface and just mention in the comments what actions
> can trigger the bug. Don't worry too much about filing it in the wrong
> place. It can be corrected by the developers.
>
>   
>> Is there a way to linked them on tracker, or should they be in the same
>> report, or as a note on an existing report, where one exists ?
>>
>>     
>
> There are ways for developers/updates to link two bug reports as
> duplicates, or as having a relation with each other.
>
>
>   
>> * Some sort of help on the ' bug tracker would be good for general
>> users. We have people here who wont file a report as 'bug tracker" seems
>> too geeky (not user friendly). Not all terms are self explanatory unless
>> you understand programming terms.
>>     
>
> Do you have suggestions for better names?
>
>  Raphael
>
>