From: <rom...@ya...> - 2007-11-24 10:25:55
|
Benny, > guess in most languages this will not have a different wording than the case of only one of the two being a partner. We don't care of inlaw_b on single_relationships, no ? Should I add "inlaw_b" to avoid mistakes with partner or UNKNOW gender ? Should I remove inlaw_a on this code ? (gendre = spouse of daughter, beau-père = father of spouse) Ga == 0: if Gb == 0: .... elif gender_b == gen.lib.Person.MALE if in_law_a and Gb == 1: rel_str = "le gendre" else: rel_str = self.get_son(Gb) elif gender_b == gen.lib.Person.FEMALE if in_law_a and Gb == 1: rel_str = "la bru" else: rel_str = self.get_daughter(Gb) elif gender_b == gen.lib.Person.MALE if in_law_a and Ga == 1: rel_str = "le beau-père" else: rel_str = self.get_father(Ga, inlaw) elif gender_b == gen.lib.Person.FEMALE and Ga < len(_mother_level): if in_law_a and Ga == 1: rel_str = "la belle-mère" else: rel_str = self.get_mother(Ga, inlaw) Maybe like in english (without STEP or INLAW) : "father of spouse" have the same wording as "second spouse of one parent". Benny Malengier a écrit : > Both true means you have person A and person B. The partner of person A > is related to the partner of person B. > I guess in most languages this will not have a different wording than > the case of only one of the two being a partner. > > Note that in most languages the terminology does not really exist > outside the direct family. However, for genealogy reasons it is > interesting to see a relationship, and use the same rules of close > family to family many generations away. For performance reasons in-law > relationships are only visible in the quick report 'relationship to home > person'. > > Also note that it is not needed to have different words for everything > if that does not exist in you language. Eg, in Italian one does not > distinguish between half-brother and stepbrother. That is a pity from > the point of view of conveying information, but cannot be helped without > sounding unnatural. > > Benny > > 2007/11/24, Josip <jo...@pi... <mailto:jo...@pi...>>: > > Benny Malengier wrote: > > > > > If people want to adapt the other modules to the new calling > methods, at > > the moment all is fresh in my mind, so I could give some help. > > > > Hi! > Can you explain what sort of relationship is when both in_law_a and > in_law_b is True? > > -- > Josip > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-devel mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel |