Re: [Gramps-devel] Release candidate available for 2.2.9

[<ste...@gm...>]

> Some possiblities:
> 2.2.8+svn20071016          my suggestion
> 2.2.8-2.2.9RC1
> 2.2.8.99

We've been at 2.2.9 for months now.  Literally starting a few hours
after 2.2.8 was released, the source code was incremented to say
2.2.9.  To release the current 2.2.9 candidate as 2.2.8-something
would mean we'd have to go backwards in our version numbers.

Also note that some of the guys are already working on 3.0.0 -- not
2.99.  When it comes time to release, shouldn't it be released as
3.0.0, not 3.0.1?  Or does it mean that trunk should actually say 2.99
instead of 3.0.0?

St=E9phane