From: <ben...@ug...> - 2006-12-31 17:14:51
|
Quoting Don Allingham <don...@co...>: > On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 18:32 +0100, ben...@ug... wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just regenerated my genealogy website which was still from 2.0.11, >> with 2.2.4. >> All went ok, but I have two remarks >> >> 1/ It was needed to read the help documentation to know what I had to do >> (footnotes and stuff). I know gramps, so this was no problem (menu help and >> browse around looking for the reports). However, for common users, a help >> button on the generator would be welcome. It would avoid many questions from >> users, as the help is really good. > > We would need someone to update the manual to provide all the needed > information. Linking to help in this manner is easy, as long as someone > has written the help documentation. I did feature requests for this, the help now is good, so can be used >> 2/ The default in the generaotr, was to not restrict info on living >> people. Has >> this not been discussed before, ending with the conclusion that it would be >> best to default to restricting info? Better an angry user for showing too >> little, than an angry user who quarrelled with a family member for >> showing too >> much. >> > > Actually, the better thing to do here is to remember the last value > selected. That way we are not forcing a policy on anyone. If someone > likes restricting, they select it once, and it stays until they change > it. Similarly if they do not like it. This is done now in GRAMPS as it remembers what I entered. I do not remember ever having run the website without privacy on this PC, however, on fresh install of 2.2.4, privacy was off. So I mean the default on first install here. I submitted this to bug too Benny ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |