Re: [Gramps-users] LVG?

[Dave P. <dav...@gm...>]

On 04/07/07, Alex Roitman <sh...@gr...> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 06:24 +0100, Dave Pawson wrote:
> > Is there any way of differentiating between 'system' types
> > and user types?
> >
> > type='Some system type'
> > vs
> > usertype='Arbitrary phrase'
>
> Not really. Gramps has it in python files.

You said that (for example) Gramps doesn't have LVG in its python files?
Hence my question?

So for every type value, the code has to check the hashmap?
So be it.

>
> > please, so that the translation side can work a little more effeciently?
>
> I suppose we can write a python script that puts all standard
> types in an XML file. Would be helpful if you opened an issue
> on http://bugs.gramps-project.org and put an example of the XML
> you would like.

any good xml will do, I can transform it.
If I ask for it in Docbook format, others will complain it doesn't suite
their xml :-)

I'm guessing you are keying off the English?

<terms>
<term>
  <key>type</key>
  <text>Type</text>
</term>
 ...

</terms>

Should be sufficient for any transform.

regards



-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk