Re: [Gramps-users] numbering of names, marriages etc

[Doug L. <lai...@ho...>]

On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:30:15 pm Don Allingham wrote:
> The big problem is defining what "rational" is. :-)
>
> If someone could do that, and cover all the bases, we could implement
> it.
>
> Don
>
> On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 11:33 -0500, David and Janet wrote:
> > Is there any neat way to renumber the whole database (in an order
> > similar to ahnnentafel, perhaps) to get something more rational?  There
> > are way too many individuals and marriages to even seriously contemplate
> > manual renumbering.
> >
> > This is NOT a Gramps created mess but I wound up being #1192 while a
> > recently added great grand uncle is #1!  That's a problem having to do
> > with exporting, importing, re-exporting ... to several programs over the
> > years.  I'm still not sure how it happened.
> >
> > Dave Rowell
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gramps-users mailing list
> > Gra...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users

How did a recently added person become #1?  Are old numbers re-used?

Doug.

-- 
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without 
accepting it.
   - Aristotle.