From: Don A. <don...@co...> - 2005-05-06 17:05:39
|
Actually, it shouldn't be hard to extend the date parser to handle this. However, I'd like to put this off until 2.0.1. Don Alex Roitman wrote: > Sorry, forgot to reply to the list. > > ---------------- > > Richard, > > On 05/06/2005 10:34:22 AM, Richard Taylor wrote: > >>I have just noticed a nasty date problem. >> >>Open any record that has a date. >>Enter something like "5th April 2004" in the date. > > > The present parser does not recognize 5th, 2nd, 3rd, etc. > > >>Save the record. >>Reopen the record. >> >>The date now says just "5". > > > In all honesty, the LED is yellow after you enter such date. > The yellow indicates partial date, so the user can click on > LED and check how the date was parsed. > > Is this not enough? Do we want to tell the user that > "the date is incomplete" any time the incomplete date > is entered? Or should we re-display the date in the field > to reflect the parsing? > > Alex > |