Re: [Gramps-devel] Upcoming 1.1.90 release

[Jason S. <wha...@co...>]

On Friday 18 February 2005 20:44, Alex Roitman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 01:45:08PM -0500, Steve Hall wrote:
> > > Given the rather significant changes I would go for 2.0.
> >
> > I agree. Going to a db backend will finally make it usable for those
> > of us with huge data sets. It is a major architectural change and the
> > file format changes as well. It is hard to imagine what else would be
> > bigger or more significant, from a development or user point of view.
>
> Yep -- the list of changes is as radical as it gets without starting
> a brand new app :-)
>
> Besides, we branched away from STABLE over a year ago. This also tells
> something about the amount of change involved.
>
> In short, I'm up for 2.0 :-)
>
> Alex

Har har.  *smirks*  See!  I'm outnumbered!  I can see from your point of view 
everyone.  Maybe the whole issue with the version number is to make us more 
consistent with the Linux kernel.

Maybe you are all using reverse psychology, making people think we are 
increasing version numbers, but in reality we all are trying to get to 2.8 as 
quickly as possible to beat the next major kernel release! *cackle*

Brilliant!

-Jason