Re: [Gramps-devel] Traditional descendant tree report

[Tim W. <tw...@re...>]

On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:42:35PM +0000, Richard Taylor wrote:

> Please take a look and let me know what you think. I am happy for this to=
 be=20
> included in Gramps if it is wanted.

This is quite good!  As you say, the fonts need some work -- perhaps a
configuration option if it can't be done automatically?

On my test there were half-siblings that got rendered as though they
were full siblings, however.

Tim.
*/