From: Johan V. <jvr...@sq...> - 2005-03-30 12:38:39
|
I promised to take a look at the dutch translation, but now I'm extremely puzzled. From CVS I checked out the two source trees: gramps (1.0.x) and gramps2 (1.1.9x (2.0 to be, I assume)). There's no dutch translation (nl.po) in the gramps source tree, although gramps 1.0.x (as distributed) handles dutch. There's a dutch translation (nl.po) in the gramps2 source tree, but it seems to be for (some old release) of 1.0.x. The template.po, which according to the WiKi should be the starting point for translation is very old as well. So I took the most recent version I could find for 1.0.x as a starting point, and updated it for 1.0.11. It's not perfect, but definitely better than the 'old' version. You can find it here: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/gramps-nl.po. Feedback (patches) welcome. Happy grampsing, -- Johan |
From: Martin H. <Mar...@gm...> - 2005-03-30 12:53:58
|
Hi Johan, > >From CVS I checked out the two source trees: gramps (1.0.x) and > gramps2 (1.1.9x (2.0 to be, I assume)). the gramps tree is an older version of gramps do not checkout that one. Gramps 1.0.x is in the same tree as the version 1.1.9x, but both are in a different branch. For the stable version 1.0.x jou have to checkout the STABLE branch: cvs co -r STABLE gramps2 For the current development version (1.1.9x) use the HEAD branch (which is default if you dont specify a branch): cvs co gramps2 Cheers, Martin. -- Sparen beginnt mit GMX DSL: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl |
From: Johan V. <jvr...@sq...> - 2005-03-30 18:29:15
|
Johan Vromans <jvr...@sq...> writes: > I promised to take a look at the dutch translation, but now I'm > extremely puzzled. Alex explained, not puzzled anymore. |