From: Serge N. <Ser...@fr...> - 2009-05-08 17:51:11
|
Hi, everybody perhaps you saw you can't edit graphics report in openoffice 3.0. After digging in the sources I was not able to see what's the problem. It seem this is an openoffice problem : We cannot select the fields with the mouse. We have a workaround : Use <shift>F4 then <tab> to navigate between the boxes to edit them. References : http://www.gramps-project.org/bugs/view.php?id=2576 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101657 Serge |
From: Serge N. <Ser...@fr...> - 2010-03-19 22:12:40
|
Hi, One year ago, I submitted a bug to openoffice.org. The status is now : will be solved in 3.3. In a few weeks, if we do nothing, it will be : Target 3.4 or higher. At linux solutions in Paris, I talked to the French openoffice team about this issue. They will try to push the bug at a higher priority, but ... They all say : In openOffice, the bug list is a big list and use priorities. As we have no support, and nobody is interested by our bug, it's at the bottom of the list. So "WE" must give it a higher priority. How ? Everybody who wants to have this bug solved quicker must vote for this bug. So We must register to the openoffice site then vote. If you know openoffice people in your country, ask them to vote for our bug. Their vote has a higher weight as ours. The pointers : The bug : http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101657 At the top right of the page, you have a register button. The vote : http://www.openoffice.org/issues/showvotes.cgi?voteon=101657 Serge Noiraud a écrit : > Hi, everybody > > perhaps you saw you can't edit graphics report in openoffice 3.0. > After digging in the sources I was not able to see what's the problem. > It seem this is an openoffice problem : > We cannot select the fields with the mouse. > > We have a workaround : > > Use <shift>F4 then <tab> to navigate between the boxes to edit them. > > References : http://www.gramps-project.org/bugs/view.php?id=2576 > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101657 > > Serge |
From: Duncan L. <dun...@gm...> - 2010-03-21 13:39:40
|
On 19 March 2010 23:12, Serge Noiraud <Ser...@fr...> wrote: ... > Everybody who wants to have this bug solved quicker must vote for this bug. > So We must register to the openoffice site then vote. > If you know openoffice people in your country, ask them to vote for our bug. > Their vote has a higher weight as ours. > > The pointers : > The bug : http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101657 Thanks for explaining how this works. I've added my 2 votes to this bug. So is this bug not because the document you mentioned doesn't pass the opendocument parser? Duncan -- 'The unconsidered life is not worth living' - Socrates |
From: Serge N. <Ser...@fr...> - 2010-03-21 21:35:46
|
Duncan Lithgow a écrit : > On 19 March 2010 23:12, Serge Noiraud <Ser...@fr...> wrote: > ... >> Everybody who wants to have this bug solved quicker must vote for this bug. >> So We must register to the openoffice site then vote. >> If you know openoffice people in your country, ask them to vote for our bug. >> Their vote has a higher weight as ours. >> >> The pointers : >> The bug : http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101657 > > Thanks for explaining how this works. I've added my 2 votes to this bug. Thanks for the gramps community. > > So is this bug not because the document you mentioned doesn't pass the > opendocument parser? This bug is accepted. I tried a version which is OK with the validator. The problem is always present. I have put the document which pass the validator without error as a new attachment. > > Duncan > |
From: Doug Morrison-C. <li...@ds...> - 2010-03-22 13:59:13
|
Let's try this email a second time! On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:35:44 +0100 Serge Noiraud <Ser...@fr...> wrote: > Duncan Lithgow a écrit : > > On 19 March 2010 23:12, Serge Noiraud <Ser...@fr...> wrote: > > ... > >> Everybody who wants to have this bug solved quicker must vote for > >> this bug. So We must register to the openoffice site then vote. > >> If you know openoffice people in your country, ask them to vote > >> for our bug. Their vote has a higher weight as ours. > >> > >> The pointers : > >> The bug : http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101657 > > Unfortunately, it looks like it is our problem and not OOo's! As someone explained on the bugtracker (well, commented), it looks like we place the box in the background. To edit something in the background, a ctrl-click is needed in the 3.x series of OOo. (In the 2.x series, I think all you had to do was double-click if there was nothing in front. Here is the 'offending' line in the style definitions in the content.xml file: style:run-through="background" Do we need the boxes in the background? Or can we just delete all these lines (they appear in most of the graphic styles)? Doug |
From: Doug Morrison-C. <li...@ds...> - 2010-03-22 14:04:37
|
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:35:44 +0100 Serge Noiraud <Ser...@fr...> wrote: > Duncan Lithgow a écrit : > > On 19 March 2010 23:12, Serge Noiraud <Ser...@fr...> wrote: > > ... > >> Everybody who wants to have this bug solved quicker must vote for > >> this bug. So We must register to the openoffice site then vote. > >> If you know openoffice people in your country, ask them to vote > >> for our bug. Their vote has a higher weight as ours. > >> > >> The pointers : > >> The bug : http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101657 > > Unfortunately, it looks like it is our problem and not theirs! As someone explained on the bugtracker (well, commented), it looks like we place the box in the background. To edit something in the background, a ctrl-click is needed in the 3.x series of OOo. (In the 2.x series, I think all you had to do was double-click if there was nothing in front. Here is the 'offending' line in the style definitions in the content.xml file: style:run-through="background" Do we need the boxes in the background? Or can we just delete all these lines (they appear in most of the graphic styles)? Doug |
From: Benny M. <ben...@gm...> - 2010-03-23 10:04:08
|
Serge, Did you try this? Does it fix the issue, or are there sideeffects which are unwanted in the report? Benny 2010/3/22 Doug Morrison-Cleary <li...@ds...> > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:35:44 +0100 > Serge Noiraud <Ser...@fr...> wrote: > > > Duncan Lithgow a écrit : > > > On 19 March 2010 23:12, Serge Noiraud <Ser...@fr...> wrote: > > > ... > > >> Everybody who wants to have this bug solved quicker must vote for > > >> this bug. So We must register to the openoffice site then vote. > > >> If you know openoffice people in your country, ask them to vote > > >> for our bug. Their vote has a higher weight as ours. > > >> > > >> The pointers : > > >> The bug : http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101657 > > > > > Unfortunately, it looks like it is our problem and not theirs! As > someone explained on the bugtracker (well, commented), it looks like we > place the box in the background. To edit something in the background, a > ctrl-click is needed in the 3.x series of OOo. (In the 2.x series, I > think all you had to do was double-click if there was nothing in front. > > Here is the 'offending' line in the style definitions in the > content.xml file: > > style:run-through="background" > > Do we need the boxes in the background? Or can we just delete all these > lines (they appear in most of the graphic styles)? > > Doug > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-devel mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > |
From: Serge N. <Ser...@fr...> - 2010-03-23 18:34:31
|
Benny Malengier a écrit : > Serge, > > Did you try this? Does it fix the issue, or are there sideeffects which > are unwanted in the report? > Yes, I tried. It seems to solve the problem. I push the patch in trunk. If after tests You are OK, I can put it in gramps32 and gramps31. > Benny > > 2010/3/22 Doug Morrison-Cleary <li...@ds... > <mailto:li...@ds...>> > > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:35:44 +0100 > Serge Noiraud <Ser...@fr... <mailto:Ser...@fr...>> > wrote: > > > Duncan Lithgow a écrit : > > > On 19 March 2010 23:12, Serge Noiraud <Ser...@fr... > <mailto:Ser...@fr...>> wrote: > > > ... > > >> Everybody who wants to have this bug solved quicker must vote for > > >> this bug. So We must register to the openoffice site then vote. > > >> If you know openoffice people in your country, ask them to vote > > >> for our bug. Their vote has a higher weight as ours. > > >> > > >> The pointers : > > >> The bug : http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101657 > > > > > Unfortunately, it looks like it is our problem and not theirs! As > someone explained on the bugtracker (well, commented), it looks like we > place the box in the background. To edit something in the background, a > ctrl-click is needed in the 3.x series of OOo. (In the 2.x series, I > think all you had to do was double-click if there was nothing in front. > > Here is the 'offending' line in the style definitions in the > content.xml file: > > style:run-through="background" > > Do we need the boxes in the background? Or can we just delete all these > lines (they appear in most of the graphic styles)? > > Doug |