You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(63) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(58) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(51) |
Dec
(19) |
2004 |
Jan
(84) |
Feb
(91) |
Mar
(31) |
Apr
(47) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(38) |
Jul
(56) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(38) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(42) |
Dec
(63) |
2005 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(75) |
Mar
(123) |
Apr
(72) |
May
(98) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(48) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(61) |
2006 |
Jan
(46) |
Feb
(43) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(41) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(52) |
Nov
(76) |
Dec
(40) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(31) |
Mar
(77) |
Apr
(19) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(77) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(26) |
2008 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(40) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(59) |
Dec
(11) |
2009 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(52) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(9) |
2010 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(21) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(28) |
Dec
(12) |
2011 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
|
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(17) |
2012 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(4) |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-08 23:36:37
|
Support Requests item #3594104, was opened at 2012-12-08 15:36 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by hamete You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=208874&aid=3594104&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: James Adams (hamete) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: filename uses epoch for time Initial Comment: gphoto2 2.4.14, libgphoto2 2.4.14, libgphoto2_port 0.8.0 raspberrypi 3.2.27+ The following command: gphoto2 --capture-image-and-download --filename "20d_%Y%m%d-%H%M%S-%03n.%C" always outputs a file name with "20d_19700101-000000-000.JPG" From the prompt, though, "date +%j" output "343", so that works fine. May be a duplicate of Bug 3311474 but that is marked as Fixed Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=208874&aid=3594104&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-05 14:24:54
|
Bugs item #3592783, was opened at 2012-12-05 05:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by smu99 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3592783&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gphoto2 Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Stefan Muthers (smu99) Assigned to: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Summary: gphoto -L fails to list files Initial Comment: I am using gphoto 2.4.14 on arch linux. Running \'gphoto -L \' with a Canon 500D attached, I get the following output: x201 ~ :: gphoto2 -L There is no file in folder \'/\'. There is no file in folder \'/store_00020001\'. There is no file in folder \'/store_00020001/DCIM\'. *** Error (-8: \'Fixed limit exceeded\') *** For debugging messages, please use the --debug option. Debugging messages may help finding a solution to your problem. If you intend to send any error or debug messages to the gphoto developer mailing list <gph...@li...>, please run gphoto2 as follows: env LANG=C gphoto2 --debug --debug-logfile=my-logfile.txt -L Please make sure there is sufficient quoting around the arguments. The debug-output can be found here http://www.climate.unibe.ch/~muthers/exchange/my-logfile.txt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stefan Muthers (smu99) Date: 2012-12-05 06:24 Message: ah ok, thank you for the quick reply. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-12-05 05:30 Message: yozu have more than 1024 images in one folder, which was not yet supported by 2.4.14. 0.460906 gphoto2-list(0): gp_list_append: Tried to add more than 1024 entries to the list, reporting error. (you have 1063 I think judging from: 0.453590 ptp2/eos_directory(2): read 1063 entries ) libgphoto2 2.5.0 has been released some months ago that gets rid of this arbitrary limit (but is binary incompatible). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3592783&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-05 13:30:15
|
Bugs item #3592783, was opened at 2012-12-05 05:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by marcusmeissner You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3592783&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gphoto2 Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Stefan Muthers (smu99) >Assigned to: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Summary: gphoto -L fails to list files Initial Comment: I am using gphoto 2.4.14 on arch linux. Running \'gphoto -L \' with a Canon 500D attached, I get the following output: x201 ~ :: gphoto2 -L There is no file in folder \'/\'. There is no file in folder \'/store_00020001\'. There is no file in folder \'/store_00020001/DCIM\'. *** Error (-8: \'Fixed limit exceeded\') *** For debugging messages, please use the --debug option. Debugging messages may help finding a solution to your problem. If you intend to send any error or debug messages to the gphoto developer mailing list <gph...@li...>, please run gphoto2 as follows: env LANG=C gphoto2 --debug --debug-logfile=my-logfile.txt -L Please make sure there is sufficient quoting around the arguments. The debug-output can be found here http://www.climate.unibe.ch/~muthers/exchange/my-logfile.txt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-12-05 05:30 Message: yozu have more than 1024 images in one folder, which was not yet supported by 2.4.14. 0.460906 gphoto2-list(0): gp_list_append: Tried to add more than 1024 entries to the list, reporting error. (you have 1063 I think judging from: 0.453590 ptp2/eos_directory(2): read 1063 entries ) libgphoto2 2.5.0 has been released some months ago that gets rid of this arbitrary limit (but is binary incompatible). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3592783&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-12-05 13:23:20
|
Bugs item #3592783, was opened at 2012-12-05 05:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by smu99 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3592783&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gphoto2 Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Stefan Muthers (smu99) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: gphoto -L fails to list files Initial Comment: I am using gphoto 2.4.14 on arch linux. Running \'gphoto -L \' with a Canon 500D attached, I get the following output: x201 ~ :: gphoto2 -L There is no file in folder \'/\'. There is no file in folder \'/store_00020001\'. There is no file in folder \'/store_00020001/DCIM\'. *** Error (-8: \'Fixed limit exceeded\') *** For debugging messages, please use the --debug option. Debugging messages may help finding a solution to your problem. If you intend to send any error or debug messages to the gphoto developer mailing list <gph...@li...>, please run gphoto2 as follows: env LANG=C gphoto2 --debug --debug-logfile=my-logfile.txt -L Please make sure there is sufficient quoting around the arguments. The debug-output can be found here http://www.climate.unibe.ch/~muthers/exchange/my-logfile.txt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3592783&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-11-29 09:27:53
|
Bugs item #3590696, was opened at 2012-11-28 05:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by marcusmeissner You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3590696&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: libgphoto2_port Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: parafin (parafin) >Assigned to: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Summary: usb1 backend doesn't check libusb_init return code Initial Comment: libusb_init function creates valid context only if it returns 0, see http://libusb.sourceforge.net/api-1.0/group__lib.html#ga9517c37281bba0b51cc62eba728be48b But libgphoto2_port/libusb1/libusb1.c does not check for that (there's 2 lines with libusb_init call), which later results in segfault in case libusb initialization does fail (it may happen if kernel was built with USB stack disabled for example). See http://darktable.org/redmine/issues/9093 for real life occurrence of this bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-11-29 01:27 Message: i added !=0 checks and error exits to SVN. thaqnks for the report! :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3590696&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-11-28 13:51:11
|
Bugs item #3590696, was opened at 2012-11-28 05:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by parafin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3590696&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: libgphoto2_port Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: parafin (parafin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: usb1 backend doesn't check libusb_init return code Initial Comment: libusb_init function creates valid context only if it returns 0, see http://libusb.sourceforge.net/api-1.0/group__lib.html#ga9517c37281bba0b51cc62eba728be48b But libgphoto2_port/libusb1/libusb1.c does not check for that (there's 2 lines with libusb_init call), which later results in segfault in case libusb initialization does fail (it may happen if kernel was built with USB stack disabled for example). See http://darktable.org/redmine/issues/9093 for real life occurrence of this bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3590696&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-11-12 08:33:54
|
Bugs item #3586114, was opened at 2012-11-10 15:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by yurivict You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3586114&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gphotofs Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Yuri (yurivict) Assigned to: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Summary: gphotofs makes all statfs/fstatfs calls fail with ENOSYS Initial Comment: Here is my log attempting to mount MTP smartphone on FreeBSD. When I am trying to mount it using gphotofs-0.4.0 I can't access the files through the mountpoint. $ gphoto2 --auto-detect Model Port ---------------------------------------------------------- Samsung GT-P7310/P7510/N7000/I9100/Galaxy Tab 7.7/10.1/S2/Nexus/Note usb:/dev/usb,/dev/ugen3.2 # gphotofs ~yuri/mountpoint/ # ls ~yuri/mountpoint ls: /home/yuri/mountpoint: Function not implemented -- command leaves the mountpoint and gphotofs process but error occurs "Function not implemented" corresponds to ENOSYS error code. This error makes such filesystem unusable. Commands like 'ls' call fstatfs first and fail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yuri (yurivict) Date: 2012-11-12 00:33 Message: I can't reproduce any more. Must have been some temporary issue. Closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-11-12 00:27 Message: this sounded like the user filesystem layer"fuse" was not working correctly on first try, like the module npot loaded or similar. please report back if it can be reproduced ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yuri (yurivict) Date: 2012-11-10 22:08 Message: I am not sure why, but I can't reproduce this error in exactly the same environment. Will watch it longer and see it it will come back. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3586114&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-11-12 08:27:11
|
Bugs item #3586114, was opened at 2012-11-10 15:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by marcusmeissner You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3586114&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gphotofs Group: None >Status: Pending >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Yuri (yurivict) >Assigned to: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Summary: gphotofs makes all statfs/fstatfs calls fail with ENOSYS Initial Comment: Here is my log attempting to mount MTP smartphone on FreeBSD. When I am trying to mount it using gphotofs-0.4.0 I can't access the files through the mountpoint. $ gphoto2 --auto-detect Model Port ---------------------------------------------------------- Samsung GT-P7310/P7510/N7000/I9100/Galaxy Tab 7.7/10.1/S2/Nexus/Note usb:/dev/usb,/dev/ugen3.2 # gphotofs ~yuri/mountpoint/ # ls ~yuri/mountpoint ls: /home/yuri/mountpoint: Function not implemented -- command leaves the mountpoint and gphotofs process but error occurs "Function not implemented" corresponds to ENOSYS error code. This error makes such filesystem unusable. Commands like 'ls' call fstatfs first and fail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-11-12 00:27 Message: this sounded like the user filesystem layer"fuse" was not working correctly on first try, like the module npot loaded or similar. please report back if it can be reproduced ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yuri (yurivict) Date: 2012-11-10 22:08 Message: I am not sure why, but I can't reproduce this error in exactly the same environment. Will watch it longer and see it it will come back. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3586114&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-11-11 06:08:17
|
Bugs item #3586114, was opened at 2012-11-10 15:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by yurivict You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3586114&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gphotofs Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Yuri (yurivict) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: gphotofs makes all statfs/fstatfs calls fail with ENOSYS Initial Comment: Here is my log attempting to mount MTP smartphone on FreeBSD. When I am trying to mount it using gphotofs-0.4.0 I can't access the files through the mountpoint. $ gphoto2 --auto-detect Model Port ---------------------------------------------------------- Samsung GT-P7310/P7510/N7000/I9100/Galaxy Tab 7.7/10.1/S2/Nexus/Note usb:/dev/usb,/dev/ugen3.2 # gphotofs ~yuri/mountpoint/ # ls ~yuri/mountpoint ls: /home/yuri/mountpoint: Function not implemented -- command leaves the mountpoint and gphotofs process but error occurs "Function not implemented" corresponds to ENOSYS error code. This error makes such filesystem unusable. Commands like 'ls' call fstatfs first and fail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yuri (yurivict) Date: 2012-11-10 22:08 Message: I am not sure why, but I can't reproduce this error in exactly the same environment. Will watch it longer and see it it will come back. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3586114&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-11-10 23:06:29
|
Bugs item #3586114, was opened at 2012-11-10 15:06 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by yurivict You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3586114&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gphotofs Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Yuri (yurivict) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: gphotofs makes all statfs/fstatfs calls fail with ENOSYS Initial Comment: Here is my log attempting to mount MTP smartphone on FreeBSD. When I am trying to mount it using gphotofs-0.4.0 I can't access the files through the mountpoint. $ gphoto2 --auto-detect Model Port ---------------------------------------------------------- Samsung GT-P7310/P7510/N7000/I9100/Galaxy Tab 7.7/10.1/S2/Nexus/Note usb:/dev/usb,/dev/ugen3.2 # gphotofs ~yuri/mountpoint/ # ls ~yuri/mountpoint ls: /home/yuri/mountpoint: Function not implemented -- command leaves the mountpoint and gphotofs process but error occurs "Function not implemented" corresponds to ENOSYS error code. This error makes such filesystem unusable. Commands like 'ls' call fstatfs first and fail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3586114&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-11-09 08:07:56
|
Bugs item #3585575, was opened at 2012-11-08 19:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by marcusmeissner You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3585575&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: libgphoto2 Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Yuri (yurivict) >Assigned to: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Summary: Inaccurate description for Samsung Galaxy Note Initial Comment: camlibs/ptp2/music-players.h lists vendor=0x04e8 product=0x6860 as "GT-P7310/P7510/N7000/I9100/Galaxy Tab 7.7/10.1/S2/Nexus/Note" However, Samsung Galaxy Note SGH-I717 also has this product id. Description needs to be updated. It gets very long. Not sure what the fix is, but it currently isn't accurate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-11-09 00:07 Message: the next release (2.5.1) will use a generic name without the lots of subtypes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yuri (yurivict) Date: 2012-11-08 20:34 Message: Long string gets very confusing. GT-P7310,GT-P7510 aren't even phones. They are tablets. N7000 is Galaxy Note phone, so as I717. But they all seem to share the word "Galaxy". Maybe say "Samsung Galaxy Phone or Tab". This is still quite specific, not too generic, and not too long. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hub Figuière (hfiguiere) Date: 2012-11-08 19:44 Message: Let's say "Samsung Phone" or something generic like that. "Samsung Galaxy Note SGH-I717" is already too specific even for that model. There are SEVERAL variants of the phablet. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3585575&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-11-09 04:34:59
|
Bugs item #3585575, was opened at 2012-11-08 19:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by yurivict You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3585575&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: libgphoto2 Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Yuri (yurivict) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Inaccurate description for Samsung Galaxy Note Initial Comment: camlibs/ptp2/music-players.h lists vendor=0x04e8 product=0x6860 as "GT-P7310/P7510/N7000/I9100/Galaxy Tab 7.7/10.1/S2/Nexus/Note" However, Samsung Galaxy Note SGH-I717 also has this product id. Description needs to be updated. It gets very long. Not sure what the fix is, but it currently isn't accurate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yuri (yurivict) Date: 2012-11-08 20:34 Message: Long string gets very confusing. GT-P7310,GT-P7510 aren't even phones. They are tablets. N7000 is Galaxy Note phone, so as I717. But they all seem to share the word "Galaxy". Maybe say "Samsung Galaxy Phone or Tab". This is still quite specific, not too generic, and not too long. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hub Figuière (hfiguiere) Date: 2012-11-08 19:44 Message: Let's say "Samsung Phone" or something generic like that. "Samsung Galaxy Note SGH-I717" is already too specific even for that model. There are SEVERAL variants of the phablet. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3585575&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-11-09 03:44:53
|
Bugs item #3585575, was opened at 2012-11-08 19:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hfiguiere You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3585575&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: libgphoto2 Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Yuri (yurivict) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Inaccurate description for Samsung Galaxy Note Initial Comment: camlibs/ptp2/music-players.h lists vendor=0x04e8 product=0x6860 as "GT-P7310/P7510/N7000/I9100/Galaxy Tab 7.7/10.1/S2/Nexus/Note" However, Samsung Galaxy Note SGH-I717 also has this product id. Description needs to be updated. It gets very long. Not sure what the fix is, but it currently isn't accurate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hub Figuière (hfiguiere) Date: 2012-11-08 19:44 Message: Let's say "Samsung Phone" or something generic like that. "Samsung Galaxy Note SGH-I717" is already too specific even for that model. There are SEVERAL variants of the phablet. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3585575&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-11-09 03:36:36
|
Bugs item #3585575, was opened at 2012-11-08 19:36 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by yurivict You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3585575&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: libgphoto2 Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Yuri (yurivict) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Inaccurate description for Samsung Galaxy Note Initial Comment: camlibs/ptp2/music-players.h lists vendor=0x04e8 product=0x6860 as "GT-P7310/P7510/N7000/I9100/Galaxy Tab 7.7/10.1/S2/Nexus/Note" However, Samsung Galaxy Note SGH-I717 also has this product id. Description needs to be updated. It gets very long. Not sure what the fix is, but it currently isn't accurate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3585575&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-10-29 17:43:56
|
Support Requests item #3581659, was opened at 2012-10-29 10:43 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by rchaber You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=208874&aid=3581659&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Richard (rchaber) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installing issue: can't exec autopoint Initial Comment: I'm trying to install gphoto-suite in my Mac, which is running OSX Mountain Lion. I got the following gnu libs: autoconf-2.68b automake-1.12.4 gettext-0.18.1.1 libtool-2.4.2 pkg-config-0.27.1 For each one I ran: ./configure sudo make sudo make install Then, for the gphoto-suite: autoreconf --install --symlink However, I got the following message: Can't exec "autopoint": No such file or directory at /usr/local/share/autoconf/Autom4te/FileUtils.pm line 344. autoreconf: failed to run autopoint: No such file or directory autoreconf: autopoint is needed because this package uses Gettext I browsed around and could't find a clue to solve my problem. Anyone could help me with that? Thanks a lot. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=208874&aid=3581659&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-10-21 16:02:30
|
Bugs item #3578822, was opened at 2012-10-20 21:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by codezion You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3578822&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gphoto2 Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Ankur B (codezion) Assigned to: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Summary: Capture tethered and keep image on camera Initial Comment: Hello, I just compiled gphoto2 and libgphoto2 2.5.0 in expectation of being able to use the --keep option with tethered shooting (--capture-tethered) while leaving the file on camera as well. Is there some trick in making this work? I am running the following command but the image is still deleted after being downloaded. gphoto2 --capture-tethered --keep Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Ankur B (codezion) Date: 2012-10-21 09:02 Message: Thanks for a quick update. I actually did try no-keep as well since I read a related post with --capture-image-and-download (ID: 3569939). Again, unless if I am doing something wrong, the no-keep option doesn't do anything either, and that's why I reported this one. If there's a patch you'd like me to try out then please let me know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-10-21 00:21 Message: I had a bug where i switched --keep and --no-keep meanings. try --no-keep in 2.5.0 will be fixed in 2.5.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3578822&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-10-21 07:21:20
|
Bugs item #3578822, was opened at 2012-10-20 21:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by marcusmeissner You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3578822&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gphoto2 Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Ankur B (codezion) >Assigned to: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Summary: Capture tethered and keep image on camera Initial Comment: Hello, I just compiled gphoto2 and libgphoto2 2.5.0 in expectation of being able to use the --keep option with tethered shooting (--capture-tethered) while leaving the file on camera as well. Is there some trick in making this work? I am running the following command but the image is still deleted after being downloaded. gphoto2 --capture-tethered --keep Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-10-21 00:21 Message: I had a bug where i switched --keep and --no-keep meanings. try --no-keep in 2.5.0 will be fixed in 2.5.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3578822&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-10-21 04:52:46
|
Bugs item #3578822, was opened at 2012-10-20 21:52 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by codezion You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3578822&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gphoto2 Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Ankur B (codezion) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Capture tethered and keep image on camera Initial Comment: Hello, I just compiled gphoto2 and libgphoto2 2.5.0 in expectation of being able to use the --keep option with tethered shooting (--capture-tethered) while leaving the file on camera as well. Is there some trick in making this work? I am running the following command but the image is still deleted after being downloaded. gphoto2 --capture-tethered --keep Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3578822&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-10-12 06:38:16
|
Support Requests item #3576591, was opened at 2012-10-11 23:38 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=208874&aid=3576591&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Mishari () Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: I/O Error on OSX Initial Comment: Hi, I'm getting I/O Errors while trying to connect to Canon EOS 1100D cameras. I have attached the debug log file. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=208874&aid=3576591&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-10-11 06:46:28
|
Bugs item #3523295, was opened at 2012-05-03 12:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by marcusmeissner You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3523295&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Matt H (mehurley) Assigned to: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Summary: PTP I/O error with Canon on 2nd command Initial Comment: Canon EOS 60D tested with 2.4.11-14 and this happens on all of them. The first request after the camera is plugged in works fine (--summary, --shell(and all commands in shell session), etc) but after that I only get generic ptp errors. This is an embedded arm system so there is no gvfs running. Is there anything else that could be locking it? debug info is attached. error output -------------------------- # gphoto2 --summary *** Error *** PTP I/O error *** Error *** An error occurred in the io-library ('Unspecified error'): No error description available *** Error (-1: 'Unspecified error') *** debug file where failure diverges ----------------------------------------------------- 2.092778 ptp(2): PTP: Opening session 2.093184 gphoto2-port(2): Writing 16=0x10 byte(s) to port... 2.093590 gphoto2-port(3): Hexdump of 16 = 0x10 bytes follows: 0000 10 00 00 00 01 00 02 10-00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 ................ Fail 2.094403 ptp2/usb_sendreq(2): request code 0x1002 sending req result -35 2.096559 ptp2/camera_init(0): ptp_opensession returns 2ff 2.096840 ptp2/device_reset_request(2): sending reset 2.097122 gphoto2-port(2): Writing message (request=0x66 value=0x0 index=0x0 size=0=0x0)... 2.097372 gphoto2-port(3): No hexdump (NULL buffer) 2.098872 ptp(2): PTP: Opening session gphoto2 --version --------------------------- # gphoto2 --version gphoto2: /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0: no version information available (required by gphoto2) gphoto2 2.4.14 ... gphoto2 2.4.14 arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb --sysroot=/home/ubuntu/chumby-oe/output-angstrom-.9/sysroots/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi, popt(m), exif, no cdk, no aa, jpeg, readline libgphoto2 2.4.14 arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb --sysroot=/home/ubuntu/chumby-oe/output-angstrom-.9/sysroots/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi, ltdl, EXIF libgphoto2_port 0.8.0 arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb --sysroot=/home/ubuntu/chumby-oe/output-angstrom-.9/sysroots/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi, ltdl, USB (libusb1), serial without locking Kernel version --------------------- # uname -a Linux 2.6.28-chumby #1 PREEMPT Fri Nov 5 18:24:54 PDT 2010 armv5tejl GNU/Linux ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-10-10 23:46 Message: acer aspire one is not a ARM platform, yes? feel free to open a new bug, but check if gvfs is dead first. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mishari () Date: 2012-10-10 18:51 Message: Hi, I am having the same problem on an Acer Aspire One V5-571G with the canon 1100D camera on Ubuntu 12.04.1 is there any updates or workarounds to this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matt H (mehurley) Date: 2012-05-03 15:21 Message: I have had no problems with it on the Ubuntu virtual machine I'm running. (version 2.4.11) Updating libusb didn't help so I'm just gonna wait until I get a new kernel on there. I'm leaning towards it being an issue with libusb/old kernel for now though. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-05-03 13:30 Message: interesting tidbit with the libusb bug. the bug is architecture independend I think ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-05-03 13:25 Message: is this different on a non-arm workstation with Linux? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matt H (mehurley) Date: 2012-05-03 13:15 Message: Thanks for the quick response but unpinpointed occasionals are not overly encouraging. :/ i have continued digging and found an identical bug in libusb on the same kernel i have (2.6.28) but for x86_64. http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=123087780315068&w=2 So it looks like it is a libusb error. I'm going to update libusb to 1.0.9 and if that doesnt work I'll assume it's an old kernel problem and wait to revisit this once I update the kernel. Thanks Marcus, Matt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-05-03 13:05 Message: the initial command here failed on the second session, with a write timeout. we see this occasionaly but so far have not pinpointed it down :/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matt H (mehurley) Date: 2012-05-03 12:55 Message: ran an strace on the two scenarios right after the Hex dump in the debug file it gets an ioctl error. gonna try to get ltrace compiled for it next and see if that gets me any further. hux dump lines -------------- gettimeofday({1335990094, 590485}, NULL) = 0 write(2, "8.042283 gphoto2-port(3): "..., 268.042283 gphoto2-port(3): ) = 26 write(2, "Hexdump of 16 = 0x10 bytes follow"..., 108Hexdump of 16 = 0x10 bytes follows: 0000 10 00 00 00 01 00 02 10-00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 ................ ) = 108 write(2, "\n"..., 1 ) successful first run, after hex dump -------------------------- gettimeofday({1335990073, 178458}, NULL) = 0 ioctl(3, USBDEVFS_SUBMITURB, 0xbeb1ec90) = 0 ioctl(3, USBDEVFS_REAPURBNDELAY, 0xbeb1ec74) = 0 gettimeofday({1335990073, 182740}, NULL) = 0 write(2, "8.841716 ptp2/ptp_usb_getresp(2):"..., 348.841716 ptp2/ptp_usb_getresp(2): ) = 34 write(2, "reading response"..., 16reading response) = 16 write(2, "\n"..., 1 ) = 1 failure second run, after hex dump ----------------------- gettimeofday({1335990094, 596736}, NULL) = 0 ioctl(3, USBDEVFS_SUBMITURB, 0xbefecc90) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) gettimeofday({1335990094, 599204}, NULL) = 0 write(2, "8.051002 ptp2/usb_sendreq(2): "..., 308.051002 ptp2/usb_sendreq(2): ) = 30 write(2, "request code 0x1002 sending req r"..., 42request code 0x1002 sending req result -35) = 42 write(2, "\n"..., 1 ) = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3523295&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-10-11 01:51:09
|
Bugs item #3523295, was opened at 2012-05-03 12:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3523295&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Matt H (mehurley) Assigned to: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Summary: PTP I/O error with Canon on 2nd command Initial Comment: Canon EOS 60D tested with 2.4.11-14 and this happens on all of them. The first request after the camera is plugged in works fine (--summary, --shell(and all commands in shell session), etc) but after that I only get generic ptp errors. This is an embedded arm system so there is no gvfs running. Is there anything else that could be locking it? debug info is attached. error output -------------------------- # gphoto2 --summary *** Error *** PTP I/O error *** Error *** An error occurred in the io-library ('Unspecified error'): No error description available *** Error (-1: 'Unspecified error') *** debug file where failure diverges ----------------------------------------------------- 2.092778 ptp(2): PTP: Opening session 2.093184 gphoto2-port(2): Writing 16=0x10 byte(s) to port... 2.093590 gphoto2-port(3): Hexdump of 16 = 0x10 bytes follows: 0000 10 00 00 00 01 00 02 10-00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 ................ Fail 2.094403 ptp2/usb_sendreq(2): request code 0x1002 sending req result -35 2.096559 ptp2/camera_init(0): ptp_opensession returns 2ff 2.096840 ptp2/device_reset_request(2): sending reset 2.097122 gphoto2-port(2): Writing message (request=0x66 value=0x0 index=0x0 size=0=0x0)... 2.097372 gphoto2-port(3): No hexdump (NULL buffer) 2.098872 ptp(2): PTP: Opening session gphoto2 --version --------------------------- # gphoto2 --version gphoto2: /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0: no version information available (required by gphoto2) gphoto2 2.4.14 ... gphoto2 2.4.14 arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb --sysroot=/home/ubuntu/chumby-oe/output-angstrom-.9/sysroots/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi, popt(m), exif, no cdk, no aa, jpeg, readline libgphoto2 2.4.14 arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb --sysroot=/home/ubuntu/chumby-oe/output-angstrom-.9/sysroots/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi, ltdl, EXIF libgphoto2_port 0.8.0 arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb --sysroot=/home/ubuntu/chumby-oe/output-angstrom-.9/sysroots/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi, ltdl, USB (libusb1), serial without locking Kernel version --------------------- # uname -a Linux 2.6.28-chumby #1 PREEMPT Fri Nov 5 18:24:54 PDT 2010 armv5tejl GNU/Linux ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mishari () Date: 2012-10-10 18:51 Message: Hi, I am having the same problem on an Acer Aspire One V5-571G with the canon 1100D camera on Ubuntu 12.04.1 is there any updates or workarounds to this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matt H (mehurley) Date: 2012-05-03 15:21 Message: I have had no problems with it on the Ubuntu virtual machine I'm running. (version 2.4.11) Updating libusb didn't help so I'm just gonna wait until I get a new kernel on there. I'm leaning towards it being an issue with libusb/old kernel for now though. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-05-03 13:30 Message: interesting tidbit with the libusb bug. the bug is architecture independend I think ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-05-03 13:25 Message: is this different on a non-arm workstation with Linux? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matt H (mehurley) Date: 2012-05-03 13:15 Message: Thanks for the quick response but unpinpointed occasionals are not overly encouraging. :/ i have continued digging and found an identical bug in libusb on the same kernel i have (2.6.28) but for x86_64. http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=123087780315068&w=2 So it looks like it is a libusb error. I'm going to update libusb to 1.0.9 and if that doesnt work I'll assume it's an old kernel problem and wait to revisit this once I update the kernel. Thanks Marcus, Matt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-05-03 13:05 Message: the initial command here failed on the second session, with a write timeout. we see this occasionaly but so far have not pinpointed it down :/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matt H (mehurley) Date: 2012-05-03 12:55 Message: ran an strace on the two scenarios right after the Hex dump in the debug file it gets an ioctl error. gonna try to get ltrace compiled for it next and see if that gets me any further. hux dump lines -------------- gettimeofday({1335990094, 590485}, NULL) = 0 write(2, "8.042283 gphoto2-port(3): "..., 268.042283 gphoto2-port(3): ) = 26 write(2, "Hexdump of 16 = 0x10 bytes follow"..., 108Hexdump of 16 = 0x10 bytes follows: 0000 10 00 00 00 01 00 02 10-00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 ................ ) = 108 write(2, "\n"..., 1 ) successful first run, after hex dump -------------------------- gettimeofday({1335990073, 178458}, NULL) = 0 ioctl(3, USBDEVFS_SUBMITURB, 0xbeb1ec90) = 0 ioctl(3, USBDEVFS_REAPURBNDELAY, 0xbeb1ec74) = 0 gettimeofday({1335990073, 182740}, NULL) = 0 write(2, "8.841716 ptp2/ptp_usb_getresp(2):"..., 348.841716 ptp2/ptp_usb_getresp(2): ) = 34 write(2, "reading response"..., 16reading response) = 16 write(2, "\n"..., 1 ) = 1 failure second run, after hex dump ----------------------- gettimeofday({1335990094, 596736}, NULL) = 0 ioctl(3, USBDEVFS_SUBMITURB, 0xbefecc90) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) gettimeofday({1335990094, 599204}, NULL) = 0 write(2, "8.051002 ptp2/usb_sendreq(2): "..., 308.051002 ptp2/usb_sendreq(2): ) = 30 write(2, "request code 0x1002 sending req r"..., 42request code 0x1002 sending req result -35) = 42 write(2, "\n"..., 1 ) = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3523295&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-10-10 06:15:24
|
Bugs item #1548739, was opened at 2006-08-29 10:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by marcusmeissner You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=1548739&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: libgphoto2 Group: None >Status: Pending >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: ggg (gerhardkgmx) >Assigned to: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Summary: thumbnails for Canon DSLR RAW files don't show Initial Comment: In the camera GUI, only jpg file thumbnails are shown and no thumbnails are shown in the cr2 files. This is tested with EOS 350D and 30D. Furthermore there are no image properties or exif data available when selecting the appropriate sidebars. Once the cr2 are downloaded all is well, thumbnails are visible and exif data is complete. Also, when the CF card is accessed through a card reader, all is well. I presume the two bugs has the same root cause, since the exif data cannot be read, the embedded thumbnail is not available either. The following error messages are produced in a shell from which digiKam was launched: digikam: Cannot parse EXIF metadata using Exiv2 digikam: [static Digikam::DImg::FORMAT Digikam::DImg::fileFormat(const QString&)] Failed to open file digikam: [static Digikam::DImg::FORMAT Digikam::DImg::fileFormat(const QString&)] Failed to open file digikam: Size of Exif metadata from camera = 20 digikam: Exif header found at position 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-10-09 23:15 Message: please open a new bug for new cameras. please. The Canon issue is fixed with 2.5.1 when it gets released. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: dive (gascooled) Date: 2012-10-09 13:11 Message: Ok I should say that I do get thumbnail images, but they are blank with a red X inside them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: dive (gascooled) Date: 2012-10-09 13:09 Message: Can I add that I'm seeing this behaviour with a lumix lx5 too. I use Shotwell to import images and was told that it was a gphoto2 problem. I built gphoto2 from svn today and the problem persists. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Emmanuel Lacour (elacour) Date: 2012-08-16 00:19 Message: I'm seeing this problem to (using gtkam or darktable). With both a canon 500d and 5DMKII using raw only. I can't attach a file to this bug, but you can find samples here: http://manu.home-dn.net/gphoto-1548739/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anders Magnusson (d98_ama) Date: 2006-11-04 07:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=214898 Stupid question: how do I attach a file? It seems lika all I can do is to submit comments... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anders Magnusson (d98_ama) Date: 2006-09-20 14:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=214898 I have a similar problem with a Canon EOS 30D, but I don't know if it is the exact same problem. When I plug in my Camera GNOME pops up a wizard that lets me import my photos. The Camera is identified correctly, but the wizard says that there are no images available. I get the same thing when I try to import my pictures using gthumb. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2006-08-30 00:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=48092 Well, the PTP transfer usually includes a pointer the thumbnail (for JPEGs), which we use. I have investigated a bit, and a CR2 file has a TIFF structure, which in turn has a JPEG preview embedded inf IFD1. tiffdump blub.cr2: .... Directory 1: offset 390952 (0x5f728) next 400497 (0x61c71) JPEGInterchangeFormat (513) LONG (4) 1<391464> JPEGInterchangeFormatLength (514) LONG (4) 1<9033> ... What we could do in libgphoto2 is partial downloads to retrieve the header parts and to extract this JPEG as preview. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ggg (gerhardkgmx) Date: 2006-08-29 12:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1586389 It is digiKam UI But it is definitely a gphoto2 problem, gtkam UI show the same fault as digiKam and Gilles Caulier thinks it is gphoto2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hub Figuière (hfiguiere) Date: 2006-08-29 12:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27487 btw which camera UI ? because what you describe is Digikam and digikam is not our problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hub Figuière (hfiguiere) Date: 2006-08-29 12:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27487 I think this has already been discussed. In PTP it looks like we don't fecth the thumbnail from the .cr2 file on Canon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2006-08-29 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=48092 can you please attach a sample cr2 file? thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=1548739&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-10-09 20:11:41
|
Bugs item #1548739, was opened at 2006-08-29 10:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gascooled You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=1548739&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: libgphoto2 Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: ggg (gerhardkgmx) Assigned to: Hub Figuière (hfiguiere) Summary: thumbnails for Canon DSLR RAW files don't show Initial Comment: In the camera GUI, only jpg file thumbnails are shown and no thumbnails are shown in the cr2 files. This is tested with EOS 350D and 30D. Furthermore there are no image properties or exif data available when selecting the appropriate sidebars. Once the cr2 are downloaded all is well, thumbnails are visible and exif data is complete. Also, when the CF card is accessed through a card reader, all is well. I presume the two bugs has the same root cause, since the exif data cannot be read, the embedded thumbnail is not available either. The following error messages are produced in a shell from which digiKam was launched: digikam: Cannot parse EXIF metadata using Exiv2 digikam: [static Digikam::DImg::FORMAT Digikam::DImg::fileFormat(const QString&)] Failed to open file digikam: [static Digikam::DImg::FORMAT Digikam::DImg::fileFormat(const QString&)] Failed to open file digikam: Size of Exif metadata from camera = 20 digikam: Exif header found at position 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: dive (gascooled) Date: 2012-10-09 13:11 Message: Ok I should say that I do get thumbnail images, but they are blank with a red X inside them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: dive (gascooled) Date: 2012-10-09 13:09 Message: Can I add that I'm seeing this behaviour with a lumix lx5 too. I use Shotwell to import images and was told that it was a gphoto2 problem. I built gphoto2 from svn today and the problem persists. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Emmanuel Lacour (elacour) Date: 2012-08-16 00:19 Message: I'm seeing this problem to (using gtkam or darktable). With both a canon 500d and 5DMKII using raw only. I can't attach a file to this bug, but you can find samples here: http://manu.home-dn.net/gphoto-1548739/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anders Magnusson (d98_ama) Date: 2006-11-04 07:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=214898 Stupid question: how do I attach a file? It seems lika all I can do is to submit comments... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anders Magnusson (d98_ama) Date: 2006-09-20 14:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=214898 I have a similar problem with a Canon EOS 30D, but I don't know if it is the exact same problem. When I plug in my Camera GNOME pops up a wizard that lets me import my photos. The Camera is identified correctly, but the wizard says that there are no images available. I get the same thing when I try to import my pictures using gthumb. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2006-08-30 00:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=48092 Well, the PTP transfer usually includes a pointer the thumbnail (for JPEGs), which we use. I have investigated a bit, and a CR2 file has a TIFF structure, which in turn has a JPEG preview embedded inf IFD1. tiffdump blub.cr2: .... Directory 1: offset 390952 (0x5f728) next 400497 (0x61c71) JPEGInterchangeFormat (513) LONG (4) 1<391464> JPEGInterchangeFormatLength (514) LONG (4) 1<9033> ... What we could do in libgphoto2 is partial downloads to retrieve the header parts and to extract this JPEG as preview. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ggg (gerhardkgmx) Date: 2006-08-29 12:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1586389 It is digiKam UI But it is definitely a gphoto2 problem, gtkam UI show the same fault as digiKam and Gilles Caulier thinks it is gphoto2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hub Figuière (hfiguiere) Date: 2006-08-29 12:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27487 btw which camera UI ? because what you describe is Digikam and digikam is not our problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hub Figuière (hfiguiere) Date: 2006-08-29 12:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27487 I think this has already been discussed. In PTP it looks like we don't fecth the thumbnail from the .cr2 file on Canon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2006-08-29 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=48092 can you please attach a sample cr2 file? thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=1548739&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-10-09 20:09:39
|
Bugs item #1548739, was opened at 2006-08-29 10:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gascooled You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=1548739&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: libgphoto2 Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: ggg (gerhardkgmx) Assigned to: Hub Figuière (hfiguiere) Summary: thumbnails for Canon DSLR RAW files don't show Initial Comment: In the camera GUI, only jpg file thumbnails are shown and no thumbnails are shown in the cr2 files. This is tested with EOS 350D and 30D. Furthermore there are no image properties or exif data available when selecting the appropriate sidebars. Once the cr2 are downloaded all is well, thumbnails are visible and exif data is complete. Also, when the CF card is accessed through a card reader, all is well. I presume the two bugs has the same root cause, since the exif data cannot be read, the embedded thumbnail is not available either. The following error messages are produced in a shell from which digiKam was launched: digikam: Cannot parse EXIF metadata using Exiv2 digikam: [static Digikam::DImg::FORMAT Digikam::DImg::fileFormat(const QString&)] Failed to open file digikam: [static Digikam::DImg::FORMAT Digikam::DImg::fileFormat(const QString&)] Failed to open file digikam: Size of Exif metadata from camera = 20 digikam: Exif header found at position 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: dive (gascooled) Date: 2012-10-09 13:09 Message: Can I add that I'm seeing this behaviour with a lumix lx5 too. I use Shotwell to import images and was told that it was a gphoto2 problem. I built gphoto2 from svn today and the problem persists. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Emmanuel Lacour (elacour) Date: 2012-08-16 00:19 Message: I'm seeing this problem to (using gtkam or darktable). With both a canon 500d and 5DMKII using raw only. I can't attach a file to this bug, but you can find samples here: http://manu.home-dn.net/gphoto-1548739/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anders Magnusson (d98_ama) Date: 2006-11-04 07:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=214898 Stupid question: how do I attach a file? It seems lika all I can do is to submit comments... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anders Magnusson (d98_ama) Date: 2006-09-20 14:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=214898 I have a similar problem with a Canon EOS 30D, but I don't know if it is the exact same problem. When I plug in my Camera GNOME pops up a wizard that lets me import my photos. The Camera is identified correctly, but the wizard says that there are no images available. I get the same thing when I try to import my pictures using gthumb. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2006-08-30 00:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=48092 Well, the PTP transfer usually includes a pointer the thumbnail (for JPEGs), which we use. I have investigated a bit, and a CR2 file has a TIFF structure, which in turn has a JPEG preview embedded inf IFD1. tiffdump blub.cr2: .... Directory 1: offset 390952 (0x5f728) next 400497 (0x61c71) JPEGInterchangeFormat (513) LONG (4) 1<391464> JPEGInterchangeFormatLength (514) LONG (4) 1<9033> ... What we could do in libgphoto2 is partial downloads to retrieve the header parts and to extract this JPEG as preview. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ggg (gerhardkgmx) Date: 2006-08-29 12:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1586389 It is digiKam UI But it is definitely a gphoto2 problem, gtkam UI show the same fault as digiKam and Gilles Caulier thinks it is gphoto2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hub Figuière (hfiguiere) Date: 2006-08-29 12:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27487 btw which camera UI ? because what you describe is Digikam and digikam is not our problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hub Figuière (hfiguiere) Date: 2006-08-29 12:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27487 I think this has already been discussed. In PTP it looks like we don't fecth the thumbnail from the .cr2 file on Canon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2006-08-29 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=48092 can you please attach a sample cr2 file? thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=1548739&group_id=8874 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-10-07 19:56:13
|
Bugs item #3569939, was opened at 2012-09-20 00:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by marcusmeissner You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3569939&group_id=8874 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Edd (edd-natstar) Assigned to: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Summary: Capture, download and keep image on memory card Initial Comment: If I understand the switches correctly I should be able to run gphoto2 --capture-image-and-download --keep and the photo should be captured, downloaded and kept on the camera, however, its captures and downloads it but deletes it from the camera's memory card. Can you confirm if I understand this correctly or if it’s a bug? I am running gphoto 2.5.0 Edd ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-10-07 12:56 Message: i spotted my mistake ... i switched --no-keep and --keep ... I turned them around in the source for 2.5.1 now, but for now you can use --no-keep to be --keep ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Edd (edd-natstar) Date: 2012-10-05 08:22 Message: Thanks that would be great ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-09-29 01:10 Message: need to debug this :/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Edd (edd-natstar) Date: 2012-09-24 01:25 Message: It captures to the card using the IMG_ format but then processed to delete it. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Meissner (marcusmeissner) Date: 2012-09-24 01:23 Message: does it capture to SDRAM (filenames "capt0000.jpg") or Card (more like IMG_1234.JPG or DSC_1234.JP)? Only the card images can be kept on camera, SDRAM capture does not allow this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Edd (edd-natstar) Date: 2012-09-24 00:41 Message: Does anyone know what the correct behaviour is? Thanks Edd ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108874&aid=3569939&group_id=8874 |