|
From: Michael G. <mic...@gm...> - 2007-12-12 21:37:17
|
On 12/12/07, Hans-Bernhard Br=F6ker <HBB...@t-...> wrote: > Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote: > > > I read the previous proposal of by the Michael. > > > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=3Ddetail&aid=3D1627936&gr= oup_id=3D2055&atid=3D302055 > > Ah, finally we get to know what that "Michael's pgnuplot" you've been > talking about actually is. > > It's not pgnuplot at all. It's actually a native console version of the > real program. To reduce confusion, such a version should really be > called "gnuplot" (no leading "w", nor "p"). > > > Why the pgnuplot has not been replaced by the Michael's one? > > For no particular reason other than that apparently nobody on the > gnuplot team felt comfortable enough committing such a major change to > the MS Windows portion of the code --- we simply have no-one with > sufficient programming skills on that forsaken platform (and available > free time) to do it. > > About the best option to change that would be volunteers to work on that > area of the code. Since april, I enhanced my patch with various fixes and upgraded it to gnuplot 4.2.2. For better visibility and maintenance, the patch is currentl= y available under SVN at http://octave.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/octave/trunk/octave-forge/admin/Wi= ndows/msvc/libs/ (current version is gnuplot-4.2.2.diff). As my intention is to build a gnuplot version that is octave-friendly, the patch contains a (very) few things that are octave-specific (like for insta= nce the modification of the gnuplot version string, to be license compliant). Michael. |