|
From: <HBB...@t-...> - 2007-12-12 21:28:09
|
Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote: > I read the previous proposal of by the Michael. > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1627936&group_id=2055&atid=302055 Ah, finally we get to know what that "Michael's pgnuplot" you've been talking about actually is. It's not pgnuplot at all. It's actually a native console version of the real program. To reduce confusion, such a version should really be called "gnuplot" (no leading "w", nor "p"). > Why the pgnuplot has not been replaced by the Michael's one? For no particular reason other than that apparently nobody on the gnuplot team felt comfortable enough committing such a major change to the MS Windows portion of the code --- we simply have no-one with sufficient programming skills on that forsaken platform (and available free time) to do it. About the best option to change that would be volunteers to work on that area of the code. |