|
From: Thomas S. <t.s...@fz...> - 2007-11-20 08:33:14
|
Hans-Bernhard Br=C3=B6ker-2 wrote: >=20 > mw...@gm... wrote: >> For me as a user, the first behavior is very irritating. I would call it >> a bug. I think that foo.tex and foo.eps should be in the same directory. >> cd should not have an effect on an already specified output file. >=20 > The problem is that "set output" really only _specifies_ the output=20 > file. It doesn't open it. And since it's a relative path, the meaning= =20 > of that specification changes on-the-fly if you change directories. >=20 sorry, no 'set output' opens the output file: gnuplot> !ls ts.ps ls: cannot access ts.ps: No such file or directory ! gnuplot> set output 'ts.ps' gnuplot> !ls ts.ps ts.ps ! if 'set output' would only specifiy, then micha's problem wouldn't arise. --=20 View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/epslatex-outputs-into-d= ifferent-directories-sometimes-tf4836648.html#a13852778 Sent from the Gnuplot - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |