|
From: Tatsuro M. <tma...@ya...> - 2007-10-29 23:37:42
|
Dear Hans-Bernhard Broerker Thank you for your reply. --- Hans-Bernhard Br醇rker <HBB...@t-...> wrote: > > Every member knows that 'pt 0' is common dot style for all terminals. > > However, the current octave set dot style, pt 7 ps 1 because 'pt 0' is too small. > > But 'pt 7' is not always filled circle for all terminal. > > So they found they had a problem, and solved it by knowingly > substituting by another problem, eh? Interesting stratety. Simple English question. What is 'stratety'? I am not good at English and I consulted dictionary and did not find it. It might be spelling miss. Please tell what you want say in easy Engligh. > > Can I change the dot size of the terminal ? > > There's no general reason 'ps' wouldn't apply to dots, too. Some > terminal drivers won't support it, though. The simple pixel-based ones, > e.g.. > I understand the situation. But I think that every devise becomes to be high resolution at present so that pixel numbers for dot is favabale to be changable. Thank you again. Tatsuro Matsuoka -------------------------------------- Easy + Joy + Powerful = Yahoo! Bookmarks x Toolbar http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/ |