|
From: Petr M. <mi...@ph...> - 2005-06-17 16:06:35
|
> > release, about a year ago, there was a general discussion of which > > patches to include. The ones you see on SourceForge dated prior > > to that point were all discussed and rejected for inclusion. > > Yes, that was what I meant. I'm sorry I judged the process little > hastily, but one certainly can get an impression that old patches are > just abandoned there. There is a discussion for each patch. You may have read that some patches have final questions like "is somebody using this patch"? > I didn't realise that they are left there for a purpose. However, I'd > still say some cleaning could take place there. Then, contribute your impression to the discussion for each particular patch. > > you would like to see included, by all means feel free to advocate > How do you do that? Or do you mean by discussing the patches on this > list? If you strongly want to support applying or closing a particular patch, write about it here, and it will get an immediate attention. --- PM |