|
From: Petr M. <mi...@ph...> - 2005-06-16 06:22:43
|
> > BTW, in the recent addition: I would prefer "substr" function name (like in > > awk) instead of the longer "substring". > > But I think awk uses substr(string, beg, length) rather than > substr(string, beg, end). Is that a problem? I see, then I propose it to use the length, not end. (Further, awk starts counting from 1...?) --- PM |