|
From: Petr M. <mi...@ph...> - 2005-06-10 09:19:00
|
> Moreover, gnuplot is really memory inefficient IMHO. To read 36M numbers > for example it needs: > > (36M * sizeof(float)) + (36M * 3 * sizeof(float)) I have started a similar discussion some time ago, when I've concluded that gnuplot needs 132 B per each point in 3D (data read + drawing cache in terminal for X11 or Windows) ... it was for "set pm3d; splot ...". Having maps organized in a different fashion would be definitely nice, but too much code relies on the current model. --- PM |