|
From:
<br...@ph...> - 2005-06-09 04:04:57
|
Robert Hart wrote: > Questions: Where did this "NO_FORTRAN_NUMS" option come from, From discussions a while back, which I now only dimly remember. The Fortran numbers parsing was added because people insisted they needed it. But it has a potential conflict with certain date/time formats (those that have "Dec" immediately following a number, which was being overwritten to "eec" by the attempt to parse it as a Fortran number), and it makes things slow. > and why isn't it enabled? Because that would break reading of datafiles that people care about. > Is Fortran number support useful? Yes. > Could it be provided in an alternative way (perhaps a run time > option)? Probably. |