|
From:
<br...@ph...> - 2005-06-07 17:50:50
|
` Lankinen wrote: > You're welcome. However, I found a new bug in the Gnuplot 4.1 CVS > logarithmic contours code. The following script doesn't work as > expected: As so often, that depends on the background of the person doing the expecting... The right way of handling this would have been to do it like the other "tick series" things in gnuplot do it, i.e. like 'set xtics'. Which means the endpoints are numbers in the input format, but the increment is a *factor*, not an addition to the logarithm. So '5,2,200' should have delivered tics at (5,10,20,40,80,160) > One thing to note is that it's not generally quite clear what is meant > by "cntrparam level incremental" in logarithmic space. Taking into account prior art, it is. It just fails to be implemented that way ;-( |