|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2005-06-04 19:17:40
|
Ethan Merritt wrote: >>Is it worth complexifying the code to save 1K bytes of memory? > > > No. But that isn't the motivation. The idea is to make > parameter allocation dynamic, so that we don't have a hard-coded > maximum number. I was just pointing out that switching to > dynamic allocation would save space as a side benefit. I almost always vote for dynamic allocation. "lot's of memory" shouldn't be an excuse for inelegant programming. Dan |