|
From: Hans-Bernhard B. <br...@ph...> - 2005-03-13 19:31:35
|
Harald Harders wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote: >>I don't thus think that *naming* the layers would be a good idea at all. >>Let them have numbers, and export those to the user interface in some >>way the users can (hopefully) understand. > Would you prefer something like this? Or how do you think it should be > implemented? A heap of #define'd numbers offer exactly no improvement over an enum --- they'ld actually be worse. The issue is not how they're defined, the issue is which parts of the programs know about, and use them. The terminal API shouldn't have to know about the meanings of individual layers' designators. |