|
From: Harald H. <h.h...@tu...> - 2005-02-14 19:30:06
|
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Ethan Merritt wrote: > On Monday 14 February 2005 09:28 am, Harald Harders wrote: > > > > Have you had a look at the header that is produced by gnuplot when using > > 'standalone'? It's not that easy to write it. It automatically selects the > > same fontsize for the output as the plot uses for calculating space of > > text. It sets the correct page size for dvips, VTeX, and pdflatex (which > > really is hard to do by hand for pdflatex). > > Isn't that just a really convoluted way to "set term pdf" ? > Why go through latex at all if you really want a pdf plot? The pdf term is _really_ much inferior to all postscript-based terminals. I have always been using the options rounded, dashlength, linewidth, monochrome|colour. And I am using different fonts than the core PDF fonts. Thus, I cannot use the pdf terminal at all. In addition, the full LaTeX syntax for text is really nice, far better than the enhanced text support of gnuplot. When -- in future -- the pdf terminal may support everything the postscript terminal already supports I will think of using the pdf terminal. Regards Harald -- Harald Harders h.h...@tu... http://www.harald-harders.de |