Re: Again, epslatex terminal

[Petr M. <mi...@ph...>]

> The patch turns out to be fairly big because I put the ASCII85 encoding
> and in its own function, thereby shuffling around a lot of code.  So there
> is an ASCII85 routine, a regular level 1 image routine--both with the same
> input/output structure.  If someone wants a new encoding, say runlength
> (which some have asked for) this works out nicely because all it means now
> is a new subroutine similar to the existing two.

There is one failure in the patch, can you please update it?

I can see there are two extraneous lines with "LT0" added to the output
postscript files added, could this be avoided?

Otherwise, the patch seems OK, so it could to cvs I think.

--
PM