|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2005-01-07 07:01:19
|
Daniel J Sebald wrote: > Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> Dear developers, >> I just checked out the CVS version and was amazed that work has been >> done on all the "killer features" I've been missing in 4.0 - THANK >> YOU!!! >> (especially "with image", "set ytics offset ...", string variables) >> >> Anyway, here's one bugreport and one feature request (for details, >> see also http://www2.nano.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~huettel/gnuplot/ ): >> >> 1) when I use identical data and an identical macro for "with pm3d" >> and "with image" (postscript terminal), the image is drawn much too >> big and covers the lower plot border. do you have any idea how to fix >> this? >> (for examples see above url) >> > > That is a strange one. I assume you have an image for which you > select a range that is only a portion of the image. This is supposed > to work fine. I will have a look this weekend. Actually, now that I look closely, I see there _aren't_ any such demos in image.dem. (I will add such an example.) I know this works in the X term driver. But I don't think any of us thought to check this out in all the terminals (i.e., PostScript, PDF, PNG, etc.). In fact, OK, I just checked a range clipped image example using the PNG terminal driver. It fails. There are two sets of coordinates sent through the terminal image call, the location of the image and the visible area. (For systems that can display portions of pixels on the edge.) I'll go through the terminals one at a time and let you know when they are ready. Thanks for find this, Dan |