|
From: Hans-Bernhard B. <br...@ph...> - 2004-12-13 12:18:16
|
Ethan Merritt wrote:
> On Sunday 12 December 2004 08:59 am, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:
>
>>I consider fixing this a major goal that absolutely has to be achieved
>>before the next official release (4.2).
>
>
> So you don't think there should be an intervening 4.1 release?
IIRC we agreed to switch to a Linux-like versioning scheme as of 4.0.
I.e. even minor for user releases, odd minor for development versions.
> [...] I am not convinced that the goal of invoking
> multiple parallel copies of the main gnuplot within the same process
> context makes any sense. Wouldn't it be easier just to fire up multiple
> separate copies of gnuplot?
For gnuplot as a process (the only thing currently existing): yes. But
for gnuplot as a (shared) library, that's not an option. AFAIK, a
single parent process can't open a single shared library more than once,
and expect those several instance to have context (i.e. global
variables) independent of each other beyond a very small number of
special variables ("instance variables", stored e.g. in the window
handle of a GUI control).
|