From: Hans-Bernhard B. <br...@ph...> - 2004-11-29 13:10:28
|
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > Axel Boldt wrote: > >Now in the "Plotting" node, there is the even more helpful hint that > >everything about the axes can be configured with the set commands, Well, that hint is slightly wrong --- at least one very central aspect of the axis (how they're actually used by the plot command) is not controlled by any 'set' command. > "help set" is a rather broad category. Would "set axes" and "set axis" > help nodes be beneficial (i.e., a list and overview of all the commands > for controling the axes--xtics, etc.)? Or would that start leading to > confusion in the sense that seeing "axes" in the subcategory of "set" > might make people think "axes" is a valid keyword? It probably would, so we had better avoid doing that. If we find we need a general overview node describing all settings relevant to individual axes, that node belongs to a different part of the documentation (i.e. as a sub-node of 'plotting' or 'introduction', not under 'commands->set/show'. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker (br...@ph...) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain. |