Re: Changes to stable branch?

[Per P. <per...@ma...>]

On Oct 21, 2004, at 18:03, Ethan Merritt wrote:

> On Thursday 21 October 2004 03:18 am, Per Persson wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm considering adding code to make aqua the default terminal to the
>> stable branch, as in CVS HEAD, but I'm not sure if that qualifies as a
>> *neccessary* change.
>
> This makes zero sense to me.
> As I recall you are telling people to download the development
> version of aquaterm, so why balk at telling them to download the
> development version of gnuplot to go with it?
> The one is no harder than the other.

Maybe I missed something, but I thought that the reason for branching 
the sources was that there would be a bugfix release of gnuplot 4.0 at 
some point in the future.
My question was if changing the default terminal was something that 
you'd like to see in a bugfix release.

I don't mind telling people to go with 4.1, in fact I'd encourage it.

/Per