Re: problems revealed by new demos

[Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...>]

Harald Harders wrote:

>On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
>
>  
>
>>>I also just tried running gnuplot's "test" image through the epslatex
>>>terminal.  Running the "xdvi" on the compiled output files results in
>>>the polyfill not appearing.  Doing "dvips test -o test.ps" created a
>>>PostScript file that crashed on the polyfill.  As you are arguing
>>>above, if it works in PostScript, a seemless transition to related
>>>terminals should be expected.
>>>      
>>>
>
>Have you used a patched epslatex terminal or the original one?
>

Original.

>My patch uses PS_init in the TERM_TABLE of the epslatex terminal which
>itself calls PS_common_init. Thus, my patch should fix this problem. In
>all test I have done I have compared the output of the postscript terminal
>with the epslatex output using 'diff'. The only difference was the missing
>text definitions in epslatex (which of course must be missing there).
>

Ah...  I didn't look at the tables, just in the code.  Thanks,

Dan