|
From: Ethan M. <merritt@u.washington.edu> - 2004-10-01 20:38:29
|
On Friday 01 October 2004 11:45 am, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > >but storing the output fd (or maybe the string used to open it) > >in the TERM_TABLE is an interesting idea. > > Sounds good. Would calling the same terminal after a push be a problem? No more so than under the current scheme. > (Can't think of a reason to use that, but a user might do it by > accident and get a resulting "file write" error after popping back the > first terminal instance. There wouldn't be any error. It would just continue writing to the most recently specified output file. Same as it does now. -- Ethan A Merritt merritt@u.washington.edu Biomolecular Structure Center Mailstop 357742 University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 |