|
From: <br...@ph...> - 2006-09-25 22:16:16
|
Scott Lamb wrote: > Oops! Yeah, my goal was to try the same version on all machines, but > I misread the "2004" as a "2006". Interestingly, 20040703 doesn't > build on these new systems; Not really surprising. PDFlib 6.0.1 is newer than that CVS version, and made incompatible changes to the API. One of them is that the PDF_open_fp() function has gone away, so gnuplot now has to use a more complicated technique to open its PDF output stream. > so instead I'm trying CVS 20060923 on a previously-working machine. > Here we go: On the RedHat Linux 4ES system (which claims to have > PDFlib 6.0.1), > > * "Sat Jul 3 00:04:32 CEST 2004" works. ... but that can't be using 6.0.1 (or at least it had to be patched to use it). You may have to use bisection on the date axis (guided by the 'cvs log' of pdf.trm to find critical spots) to find the patch that broke this (starting off the first version that works with PDFlib 6). |