|
From: <br...@ph...> - 2006-09-25 20:25:15
|
Scott Lamb wrote:
> Using PDFlib Lite 6.0.1 and gnuplot 4.1 CVS 20060923, "set terminal pdf"
> output is missing pointtypes 0 (".") and 1 ("+").
Pointtype 0 isn't missing --- it's just so small that you have to crank
up the zoom quite a bit to see it (600% or above). The only real
problem in that plot is pt1. That should be a + or so, but it's a dot, too.
> This happens on a couple of my machines:
>
> * Fedora Core 5, x86_64
> * Fedora Core 5, i386
>
> but a couple others are fine:
>
> * OS X 10.4
> * RedHat Linux 4ES
> The last two are running an older version - "Sat Jul 3 00:04:32 CEST
> 2004", they claim - but when I try 20060703 on one of the FC5 machines,
> I still have this problem.
Too many variables: 3 different types of CPU, 3 OSes, 3 different CVS
versions of gnuplot (20060923, 20060703, 20040703). You'll have to
reduce the variance to get a meaningful result.
For all you've shown so far, this could be a bug in either PDFlib or
pdf.trm that only shows up under very specific conditions.
Does normal plotting work better than 'test'? E.g. does 'plot sin(x)
with points pt1' contain proper '+' symbols?
|