|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2003-10-17 18:45:18
|
Me? :) Dave is the one who doesn't seem to mind them... Anyway, my original point is that Dartmouth list seemed to be a real spam target. There seemed to be about one or two per day routed through it. I just imagine there was a ton of spam we didn't see. I suspect there are spammers out there that collect emails by an automated means. (Would this be technically a form of data mining?) I suspect that collecting addresses and selling them is a source of revenue for some. (Should be made universally illegal folks, I decree.) Call me paranoid, but I'd prefer not having my address on a list in which an automated program can "who" it and search for @ symbols. I can't recall a single spam to my alias address for about three years until recently. (I'm not blaming gnuplot-info.) And now I can see the slow increase in amount. (Expletive deleted.) Dan Lars Hecking wrote: >>If you got an email from me ranting about the list members email >>addresses not being made publicly available, then yes. >> >> > > I'll go and forward the 6000 spam emails I receive every month to > you then, will I? > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. >SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. >See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: >Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php >_______________________________________________ >gnuplot-beta mailing list >gnu...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta > > > > -- Dan Sebald email: dan...@ie... URL: http://acer-access.com/~ds...@ac.../ |